[PATCH v2 1/3] dt-bindings: soc: imx: fsl,imx93-media-blk-ctrl: Allow LVDS Display Bridge child node

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On Mon, Jun 08, 2026 at 05:04:22PM +0800, Liu Ying wrote:
> i.MX93 SoC mediamix blk-ctrl contains one LDB_CTRL register and one LVDS
> register which control video output through a LVDS interface.  Allow the
> LVDS Display Bridge(LDB) child node and add the child node to example.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Liu Ying <victor.liu at nxp.com>
> ---
>  .../bindings/soc/imx/fsl,imx93-media-blk-ctrl.yaml | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 39 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/imx/fsl,imx93-media-blk-ctrl.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/imx/fsl,imx93-media-blk-ctrl.yaml
> index d828c2e82965..124f5c206ee3 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/imx/fsl,imx93-media-blk-ctrl.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/imx/fsl,imx93-media-blk-ctrl.yaml
> @@ -26,6 +26,12 @@ properties:
>    reg:
>      maxItems: 1
>  
> +  '#address-cells':
> +    const: 1
> +
> +  '#size-cells':
> +    const: 1
> +
>    '#power-domain-cells':
>      const: 1
>  
> @@ -92,6 +98,11 @@ properties:
>        - compatible
>        - ports
>  
> +  bridge at 20:

You have dpi-bridge, so this should not be different. You should not mix
addressable and non-addressable nodes and NXP decided recently in
3feaa4342637eef673243dd38ccb32e8dc8efd5a that everything will be
non-addressable.

Writing bindings ask explicitly to post bindings, so if you decide to do
half-baked solutions it's on you. Half baked solutions are not allowing
to bypass standard rules.

Best regards,
Krzysztof