[RFC PATCH v2 1/3] mm/huge_memory: make persistent huge zero folio read-only
Andrew Morton
akpm at linux-foundation.org
Tue Jun 9 12:45:49 PDT 2026
On Tue, 9 Jun 2026 22:37:59 +0800 Xueyuan Chen <xueyuan.chen21 at gmail.com> wrote:
> The huge zero folio is shared globally, and its contents should never
> change after initialization. As Jann Horn pointed out[1], the kernel has
> had bugs, including security bugs, where read-only pages were later written
> to. If the persistent huge zero folio is read-only in the direct map, such
> writes fault instead of silently corrupting the shared zero contents.
>
> Add arch_make_pages_readonly() so mm code can request read-only direct-map
> protection for a page range. Direct-map protection is
> architecture-specific, so the generic weak implementation does nothing.
>
> This was inspired by Jann Horn's read-only zero page work[1] and follow-up
> discussion[2] with Yang Shi.
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20260508-ro-zeropage-v1-1-9808abc20b49@google.com/
> [2] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/CAHbLzkrXXe7r3n3jXgDKtwZhRqj=jDx9E6dLOULohnhBguvi9A@mail.gmail.com/
>
> ...
>
> --- a/mm/huge_memory.c
> +++ b/mm/huge_memory.c
> @@ -308,6 +308,11 @@ static unsigned long shrink_huge_zero_folio_scan(struct shrinker *shrink,
> return 0;
> }
>
> +bool __weak arch_make_pages_readonly(struct page *page, int nr_pages)
> +{
> + return false;
> +}
> +
> static struct shrinker *huge_zero_folio_shrinker;
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_SYSFS
> @@ -982,8 +987,14 @@ static int __init thp_shrinker_init(void)
> * that get_huge_zero_folio() will most likely not fail as
> * thp_shrinker_init() is invoked early on during boot.
> */
> - if (!get_huge_zero_folio())
> + if (!get_huge_zero_folio()) {
> pr_warn("Allocating persistent huge zero folio failed\n");
> + return 0;
> + }
> +
> + arch_make_pages_readonly(folio_page(huge_zero_folio, 0),
> + HPAGE_PMD_NR);
Can it simply pass the folio?
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list