[PATCH] KVM: arm64: Add kvm_for_each_vncr_tlb() helper

[Oliver Upton]

Hey Marc,

Especially since this is a stable-worthy fix, it might be worth calling
out the bug in the shortlog, e.g.

  KVM: arm64: nv: Avoid dereferencing NULL VNCR pseudo-TLB

On Sun, Jun 07, 2026 at 06:57:45PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> VNCR TLB invalidation occurs from MMU notifiers or TLBI instructions,
> and either can race against a vcpu not being onlined yet (no pseudo-TLB
> allocated). Similarly, the TLB might be invalid, and the invalidation
> should be skipped in this case.
> 
> Both kvm_invalidate_vncr_ipa() and kvm_invalidate_vncr_va() are
> expected to perform the same checks, except that the latter doesn't
> check for the allocation and blindly dereferences the pointer.
> 
> Solve this by introducing a new iterator built on top of the usual
> kvm_for_each_vcpu() that checks for both of the above conditions,
> and convert the two users to it.
> 
> Reported-by: Hyunwoo Kim <imv4bel at gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz at kernel.org>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/aiUvSbrWndQeUPc8@v4bel
> Fixes: 4ffa72ad8f37 ("KVM: arm64: nv: Add S1 TLB invalidation primitive for VNCR_EL2")
> Cc: stable at vger.kernel.org

Looks good

Reviewed-by: Oliver Upton <oupton at kernel.org>

Thanks,
Oliver

> ---
>  arch/arm64/kvm/nested.c | 36 +++++++++++++++---------------------
>  1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/nested.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/nested.c
> index f8d3f3a723282..690b8e8564166 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/nested.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/nested.c
> @@ -908,9 +908,21 @@ static void invalidate_vncr(struct vncr_tlb *vt)
>  		clear_fixmap(vncr_fixmap(vt->cpu));
>  }
>  
> +/*
> + * VNCR TLB invalidation occurs from MMU notifiers or TLBI instructions, and
> + * either can race against a vcpu not being onlined yet (no pseudo-TLB
> + * allocated). Similarly, the TLB might be invalid.  Skip those, as they
> + * obviously don't participate in the invalidation at this stage.
> + */
> +#define kvm_for_each_vncr_tlb(idx, vcpup, tlbp, kvm)	\
> +	kvm_for_each_vcpu(idx, vcpup, kvm)		\
> +		if (((tlbp) = vcpup->arch.vncr_tlb) &&	\
> +		    (tlbp)->valid)
> +
>  static void kvm_invalidate_vncr_ipa(struct kvm *kvm, u64 start, u64 end)
>  {
>  	struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
> +	struct vncr_tlb *vt;
>  	unsigned long i;
>  
>  	lockdep_assert_held_write(&kvm->mmu_lock);
> @@ -918,24 +930,9 @@ static void kvm_invalidate_vncr_ipa(struct kvm *kvm, u64 start, u64 end)
>  	if (!kvm_has_feat(kvm, ID_AA64MMFR4_EL1, NV_frac, NV2_ONLY))
>  		return;
>  
> -	kvm_for_each_vcpu(i, vcpu, kvm) {
> -		struct vncr_tlb *vt = vcpu->arch.vncr_tlb;
> +	kvm_for_each_vncr_tlb(i, vcpu, vt, kvm) {
>  		u64 ipa_start, ipa_end, ipa_size;
>  
> -		/*
> -		 * Careful here: We end-up here from an MMU notifier,
> -		 * and this can race against a vcpu not being onlined
> -		 * yet, without the pseudo-TLB being allocated.
> -		 *
> -		 * Skip those, as they obviously don't participate in
> -		 * the invalidation at this stage.
> -		 */
> -		if (!vt)
> -			continue;
> -
> -		if (!vt->valid)
> -			continue;
> -
>  		ipa_size = ttl_to_size(pgshift_level_to_ttl(vt->wi.pgshift,
>  							    vt->wr.level));
>  		ipa_start = vt->wr.pa & ~(ipa_size - 1);
> @@ -965,17 +962,14 @@ static void invalidate_vncr_va(struct kvm *kvm,
>  			       struct s1e2_tlbi_scope *scope)
>  {
>  	struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
> +	struct vncr_tlb *vt;
>  	unsigned long i;
>  
>  	lockdep_assert_held_write(&kvm->mmu_lock);
>  
> -	kvm_for_each_vcpu(i, vcpu, kvm) {
> -		struct vncr_tlb *vt = vcpu->arch.vncr_tlb;
> +	kvm_for_each_vncr_tlb(i, vcpu, vt, kvm) {
>  		u64 va_start, va_end, va_size;
>  
> -		if (!vt->valid)
> -			continue;
> -
>  		va_size = ttl_to_size(pgshift_level_to_ttl(vt->wi.pgshift,
>  							   vt->wr.level));
>  		va_start = vt->gva & ~(va_size - 1);
> -- 
> 2.47.3
>