[PATCH v3 3/5] drm/verisilicon: introduce per-variant hardware ops table
Joey Lu
a0987203069 at gmail.com
Mon Jun 8 03:35:50 PDT 2026
On 6/8/2026 6:06 PM, Icenowy Zheng wrote:
> 在 2026-06-08一的 17:45 +0800,Joey Lu写道:
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/verisilicon/vs_primary_plane.c
>>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/verisilicon/vs_primary_plane.c
>>>> index 1f2be41ae496..75bc36a078f7 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/verisilicon/vs_primary_plane.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/verisilicon/vs_primary_plane.c
>>>> @@ -53,12 +53,6 @@ static int
>>>> vs_primary_plane_atomic_check(struct
>>>> drm_plane *plane,
>>>> return 0;
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> -static void vs_primary_plane_commit(struct vs_dc *dc, unsigned
>>>> int
>>>> output)
>>>> -{
>>>> - regmap_set_bits(dc->regs, VSDC_FB_CONFIG_EX(output),
>>>> - VSDC_FB_CONFIG_EX_COMMIT);
>>>> -}
>>>> -
>>>> static void vs_primary_plane_atomic_enable(struct drm_plane
>>>> *plane,
>>>> struct
>>>> drm_atomic_commit
>>>> *atomic_state)
>>>> {
>>>> @@ -69,13 +63,8 @@ static void
>>>> vs_primary_plane_atomic_enable(struct
>>>> drm_plane *plane,
>>>> unsigned int output = vcrtc->id;
>>>> struct vs_dc *dc = vcrtc->dc;
>>>>
>>>> - regmap_set_bits(dc->regs, VSDC_FB_CONFIG_EX(output),
>>>> - VSDC_FB_CONFIG_EX_FB_EN);
>>>> - regmap_update_bits(dc->regs, VSDC_FB_CONFIG_EX(output),
>>>> - VSDC_FB_CONFIG_EX_DISPLAY_ID_MASK,
>>>> -
>>>> VSDC_FB_CONFIG_EX_DISPLAY_ID(output));
>>>> -
>>>> - vs_primary_plane_commit(dc, output);
>>>> + if (dc->funcs->plane_enable_ex)
>>>> + dc->funcs->plane_enable_ex(dc, output);
>>> Please note that all theae codes are for primary planes, maybe the
>>> helper should be named mentioning primary. Overlay planes will need
>>> a
>>> different codepath because they change different registers.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Icenowy
>> Understood. To avoid confusion, I will rename `plane_enable_ex`,
>> `plane_disable_ex`, and `plane_update_ex` to `primary_plane_enable`,
>> `primary_plane_disable`, and `primary_plane_update` in `vs_dc_funcs`,
>> `vs_dc8200.c`, and `vs_primary_plane.c`.
> Maybe keep the `_ex` here as some operations is still on the common
> codepath?
>
> Thanks,
> Icenowy
Got it. I’ll keep the `_ex` suffix in place. That way it’s consistent
with the common codepath operations, and the inline comments already
makes the intent clear.
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> static void vs_primary_plane_atomic_disable(struct drm_plane
>>>> *plane,
>>>> @@ -88,10 +77,8 @@ static void
>>>> vs_primary_plane_atomic_disable(struct
>>>> drm_plane *plane,
>>>> unsigned int output = vcrtc->id;
>>>> struct vs_dc *dc = vcrtc->dc;
>>>>
>>>> - regmap_set_bits(dc->regs, VSDC_FB_CONFIG_EX(output),
>>>> - VSDC_FB_CONFIG_EX_FB_EN);
>>>> -
>>>> - vs_primary_plane_commit(dc, output);
>>>> + if (dc->funcs->plane_disable_ex)
>>>> + dc->funcs->plane_disable_ex(dc, output);
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> static void vs_primary_plane_atomic_update(struct drm_plane
>>>> *plane,
>>>> @@ -133,18 +120,11 @@ static void
>>>> vs_primary_plane_atomic_update(struct drm_plane *plane,
>>>> regmap_write(dc->regs, VSDC_FB_STRIDE(output),
>>>> fb->pitches[0]);
>>>>
>>>> - regmap_write(dc->regs, VSDC_FB_TOP_LEFT(output),
>>>> - VSDC_MAKE_PLANE_POS(state->crtc_x, state-
>>>>> crtc_y));
>>>> - regmap_write(dc->regs, VSDC_FB_BOTTOM_RIGHT(output),
>>>> - VSDC_MAKE_PLANE_POS(state->crtc_x + state-
>>>>> crtc_w,
>>>> - state->crtc_y + state-
>>>>> crtc_h));
>>>> regmap_write(dc->regs, VSDC_FB_SIZE(output),
>>>> VSDC_MAKE_PLANE_SIZE(state->crtc_w, state-
>>>>> crtc_h));
>>>>
>>>> - regmap_write(dc->regs, VSDC_FB_BLEND_CONFIG(output),
>>>> - VSDC_FB_BLEND_CONFIG_BLEND_DISABLE);
>>>> -
>>>> - vs_primary_plane_commit(dc, output);
>>>> + if (dc->funcs->plane_update_ex)
>>>> + dc->funcs->plane_update_ex(dc, output, state);
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> static const struct drm_plane_helper_funcs
>>>> vs_primary_plane_helper_funcs = {
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list