[PATCH v3] net: stmmac: Improve Tx timer arm logic further
Jakub Kicinski
kuba at kernel.org
Tue Jun 2 19:20:36 PDT 2026
On Thu, 28 May 2026 23:46:59 -0700
muhammad.nazim.amirul.nazle.asmade at altera.com wrote:
> There is no race concern: hrtimer_start() is internally serialized and
> safe to call on an active timer. In the event of a race between
> hrtimer_active() and hrtimer_start(), the worst case is calling
> hrtimer_start() on an already-active timer, which is identical to the
> pre-patch behaviour.
I mean.. I wouldn't say that this is not racy. But I think you're not
making it much worse than it already was :S
Could you experiment with deleting all this local driver logic and just
relying on NAPI's built-in defer IRQ mechanism?
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list