[PATCH] fix: arm64: syscall: use live x0 for syscall_get_arguments() arg0

Will Deacon will at kernel.org
Mon Jun 1 05:43:42 PDT 2026


On Fri, May 29, 2026 at 02:54:44PM +0800, Yiqi Sun wrote:
> On arm64, seccomp obtains syscall arguments via syscall_get_arguments(),
> where arg0 is currently read from regs->orig_x0. However, the syscall
> wrapper consumes live arguments from regs->regs[0..5].
> 
> A ptracer can modify x0 on syscall-enter stop before seccomp runs,
> but cannot update orig_x0 through that interface. This can
> leave seccomp checking stale arg0 while the syscall executes with updated
> live x0, allowing seccomp bypass when filters depend on arg0.
> 
> Make syscall_get_arguments() read arg0 from regs->regs[0], matching the
> actual dispatch arguments and removing this desynchronization.
> 
> Fixes: f27bb139c387 ("arm64: Miscellaneous library functions")
> Signed-off-by: Yiqi Sun <sunyiqixm at gmail.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/syscall.h | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/syscall.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/syscall.h
> index 5e4c7fc44f73..4bdb4d3ce2b4 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/syscall.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/syscall.h
> @@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ static inline void syscall_get_arguments(struct task_struct *task,
>  					 struct pt_regs *regs,
>  					 unsigned long *args)
>  {
> -	args[0] = regs->orig_x0;
> +	args[0] = regs->regs[0];
>  	args[1] = regs->regs[1];
>  	args[2] = regs->regs[2];
>  	args[3] = regs->regs[3];
> -- 
> 2.34.1

Hrm, this looks like a long-standing issue and I'm pretty nervous about
changing it :/

How did you spot it?

A quick look at the code suggests we have a similar issue with
audit_syscall_entry(), so if we take your patch here then it will silently
introduce a behavioural change to this guy:

https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260320102620.1336796-5-ruanjinjie@huawei.com/

I also notice that the compat ptrace interface allows 'orig_x0' to be
set -- could that cause issues with things like syscall_rollback()?

Will



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list