[PATCH v5 10/10] arm_mpam: detect and enable MPAM-Fb PCC support
Srivathsa L Rao
srivathsa.rao at oss.qualcomm.com
Thu Jul 30 02:58:03 PDT 2026
Hi Andre ,
On 7/29/2026 7:11 PM, Andre Przywara wrote:
> The Arm MPAM-Fb specification [1] describes a protocol to access MSC
> registers through a firmware interface. This requires a shared memory
> region to hold the message, and a mailbox to trigger the access.
> For ACPI this is wrapped as a PCC channel, described using existing
> ACPI abstractions.
>
> Add code to parse those PCC table descriptions associated with an MSC,
> and store the parsed information in the MSC struct.
> There can be multiple PCC channels, and each channel can serve multiple
> MSCs, so we need to keep track of the channel usage, using a list and
> a refcount.
>
> This will be used by the MPAM-Fb access wrapper code.
>
> [1] https://developer.arm.com/documentation/den0144/latest
>
> Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara at arm.com>
> ---
> drivers/resctrl/mpam_devices.c | 119 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> drivers/resctrl/mpam_fb.c | 4 +-
> drivers/resctrl/mpam_internal.h | 6 +-
> 3 files changed, 124 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/resctrl/mpam_devices.c b/drivers/resctrl/mpam_devices.c
> index e535603d2c7d..e360051f4aa7 100644
> --- a/drivers/resctrl/mpam_devices.c
> +++ b/drivers/resctrl/mpam_devices.c
> @@ -19,14 +19,19 @@
> #include <linux/irqdesc.h>
> #include <linux/list.h>
> #include <linux/lockdep.h>
> +#include <linux/mailbox_client.h>
> #include <linux/mutex.h>
> #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> #include <linux/printk.h>
> +#include <linux/property.h>
> #include <linux/srcu.h>
> #include <linux/spinlock.h>
> #include <linux/types.h>
> #include <linux/workqueue.h>
>
[...]
> /*
> * Number of MSCs that have been probed. Once all MSCs have been probed MPAM
> * can be enabled.
> @@ -2221,6 +2304,8 @@ static void mpam_msc_drv_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> struct mpam_msc *msc = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
>
> + mpam_pcc_chan_put(msc->pcc_chan);
> +
> mutex_lock(&mpam_list_lock);
> mpam_msc_destroy(msc);
> mutex_unlock(&mpam_list_lock);
> @@ -2231,7 +2316,7 @@ static void mpam_msc_drv_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> static struct mpam_msc *do_mpam_msc_drv_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> int err;
> - u32 tmp;
> + u32 pcc_subspace_id;
> struct mpam_msc *msc;
> struct resource *msc_res;
> struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> @@ -2279,7 +2364,7 @@ static struct mpam_msc *do_mpam_msc_drv_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> if (err)
> return ERR_PTR(err);
>
> - if (device_property_read_u32(&pdev->dev, "pcc-channel", &tmp))
> + if (device_property_read_u32(dev, "pcc-channel", &pcc_subspace_id))
> msc->iface = MPAM_IFACE_MMIO;
> else
> msc->iface = MPAM_IFACE_PCC;
> @@ -2295,6 +2380,36 @@ static struct mpam_msc *do_mpam_msc_drv_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> }
> msc->mapped_hwpage_sz = msc_res->end - msc_res->start;
Ritwick pointed out in the v4 thread that mapped_hwpage_sz should use
resource_size() rather than open-coding (end - start). That fix doesn't
appear to have made it into v5.
Also I did verify the resource_size() in my setup by adding prints, it
did work well.> msc->mapped_hwpage = io;
> + } else if (msc->iface == MPAM_IFACE_PCC) {
> + int ret;
> +
> + msc->pcc_chan = mpam_pcc_chan_get(dev, pcc_subspace_id);
> + if (IS_ERR(msc->pcc_chan)) {
> + pr_err("Failed to request MSC PCC channel\n");
> + return ERR_CAST(msc->pcc_chan);
> + }
> +
> + if (msc->pcc_chan->pcc_chan->shmem_size < MPAM_FB_MAX_MSG_SIZE) {
> + pr_err("MPAM-Fb PCC channel size too small.\n");
> + mpam_pcc_chan_put(msc->pcc_chan);
> + return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> + }
> + ret = mpam_fb_get_protocol_version(msc);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + pr_err("Cannot query MPAM-Fb protocol version.\n");
> + mpam_pcc_chan_put(msc->pcc_chan);
> +
> + /* ret is an MPAM-Fb error code, return a Linux one. */
> + return ERR_PTR(-EIO);
> + }
> + if (FIELD_GET(MPAM_FB_VERSION_MAJOR_MASK, ret) != 1) {
> + pr_err("Incompatible MPAM-Fb protocol version %ld.%ld\n",
> + FIELD_GET(MPAM_FB_VERSION_MAJOR_MASK, ret),
> + FIELD_GET(MPAM_FB_VERSION_MINOR_MASK, ret));
> + mpam_pcc_chan_put(msc->pcc_chan);
> +
> + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> + }
> } else {
> return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> }
> diff --git a/drivers/resctrl/mpam_fb.c b/drivers/resctrl/mpam_fb.c
> index dbe984241b0d..55c4778a8379 100644
> --- a/drivers/resctrl/mpam_fb.c
> +++ b/drivers/resctrl/mpam_fb.c
> @@ -190,13 +190,13 @@ static int mpam_fb_send_request(struct mpam_pcc_chan *pcc_chan, u32 msc_id,
>
> int mpam_fb_send_read_request(struct mpam_msc *msc, u16 reg, u32 *result)
> {
> - return mpam_fb_send_request(msc->pcc_chan, msc->mpam_fb_msc_id,
> + return mpam_fb_send_request(msc->pcc_chan, msc->id,
> reg, result, MPAM_MSC_READ_CMD);
> }
>
> int mpam_fb_send_write_request(struct mpam_msc *msc, u16 reg, u32 value)
> {
> - return mpam_fb_send_request(msc->pcc_chan, msc->mpam_fb_msc_id,
> + return mpam_fb_send_request(msc->pcc_chan, msc->id,
> reg, &value, MPAM_MSC_WRITE_CMD);
> }
>
> diff --git a/drivers/resctrl/mpam_internal.h b/drivers/resctrl/mpam_internal.h
> index a2193e7df57c..e926b7feb72a 100644
> --- a/drivers/resctrl/mpam_internal.h
> +++ b/drivers/resctrl/mpam_internal.h
> @@ -77,7 +77,6 @@ struct mpam_msc {
> /* Not modified after mpam_is_enabled() becomes true */
> enum mpam_msc_iface iface;
> struct mpam_pcc_chan *pcc_chan;
> - int mpam_fb_msc_id; /* in its own name space */
> u32 nrdy_usec;
> cpumask_t accessibility;
> bool has_extd_esr;
> @@ -532,6 +531,11 @@ int mpam_fb_send_write_request(struct mpam_msc *msc, u16 reg, u32 value);
> int mpam_fb_get_protocol_version(struct mpam_msc *msc);
>
> #define MPAM_FB_PROT_HEADER_LEN sizeof(u32)
> +/* The longest message is MPAM_MSC_WRITE, with 4 parameters. */
> +#define MPAM_FB_MAX_MSG_SIZE (MPAM_FB_PROT_HEADER_LEN + 4 * sizeof(u32))
> +
> +#define MPAM_FB_VERSION_MAJOR_MASK GENMASK(31, 16)
> +#define MPAM_FB_VERSION_MINOR_MASK GENMASK(15, 0)
>
> /*
> * MPAM MSCs have the following register layout. See:
--
Best Regards,
Srivathsa
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list