[PATCH 2/2] ACPI/IORT: use platform_device_set_fwnode()

Sudeep Holla sudeep.holla at kernel.org
Tue Jul 28 08:59:10 PDT 2026


On Tue, Jul 28, 2026 at 04:07:17PM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> Platform devices using the split approach of calling
> platform_device_alloc() and platform_device_add() must not assign the
> firmware nodes manually but use the provided
> platform_device_set_fwnode() function which additionally makes sure we
> track the reference count of the firmware node correctly.
> 
> Replace the manual assignment of the firmware node with a call to
> platform_device_set_fwnode().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski at oss.qualcomm.com>
> ---
>  drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c b/drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c
> index 34412cd697d8bdc3654c40ca539ddc695a926a26..1020ac953e428797b5b90bd73c6c6ae35e6fd352 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c
> @@ -1992,7 +1992,7 @@ static int __init iort_add_platform_device(struct acpi_iort_node *node,
>  		goto dev_put;
>  	}
>  
> -	pdev->dev.fwnode = fwnode;
> +	platform_device_set_fwnode(pdev, fwnode);
>  

Acked-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla at kernel.org>

With the condition specified in 1/2. I assume you plan to take it via the
same tree that introduces platform_device_set_fwnode() ?

-- 
Regards,
Sudeep



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list