[RFC PATCH v2 34/45] arm64: nmi: Add handling of superpriority interrupts as NMIs

Jinjie Ruan ruanjinjie at huawei.com
Tue Jul 28 05:25:03 PDT 2026



在 2026/7/28 0:34, Vladimir Murzin 写道:
> From: Mark Brown <broonie at kernel.org>
> 
> Our goal with superpriority interrupts is to use them as NMIs, taking
> advantage of the much smaller regions where they are masked to allow
> prompt handling of the most time-critical interrupts.
> 
> When an interrupt is configured with superpriority, we enter EL1 as we
> do for any other interrupt. The presence of a superpriority interrupt
> is indicated by a status bit in ISR_EL1. We check this bit before
> unmasking interrupts in elX_interrupt(), and if a superpriority
> interrupt is pending, we handle it as an NMI. Otherwise, normal
> interrupts are handled as usual.
> 
> Since superpriority interrupts are always handled as NMIs, the
> interrupt controller can rely on in_nmi() to distinguish them from
> ordinary interrupts.
> 
> Enable IPIs to use superpriority interrupts as NMIs, matching the
> existing pseudo-NMI behaviour.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie at kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Ada Couprie Diaz <ada.coupriediaz at arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Murzin <vladimir.murzin at arm.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/entry-common.h |  7 +++
>  arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c      | 83 +++++++++++++++++++++++----
>  arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c               |  2 +-
>  3 files changed, 79 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/entry-common.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/entry-common.h
> index 73d82a8d8e95..0681ba91ac3b 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/entry-common.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/entry-common.h
> @@ -37,6 +37,13 @@ static inline bool arch_irqentry_exit_need_resched(void)
>  	if (system_uses_irq_prio_masking() && read_sysreg(daif))
>  		return false;
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * If AllInt is set then we must have handled an NMI, so skip
> +	 * preemption
> +	 */
> +	if (system_uses_nmi() && read_sysreg_s(SYS_ALLINT))
> +		return false;
> +
>  	/*
>  	 * Preempting a task from an IRQ means we leave copies of PSTATE
>  	 * on the stack. cpufeature's enable calls may modify PSTATE, but
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c
> index a409cd6159a4..4d4db47ccdd2 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c
> @@ -31,6 +31,14 @@
>  #include <asm/sysreg.h>
>  #include <asm/system_misc.h>
>  
> +static __always_inline bool is_nmi(void)
> +{
> +	if (!system_uses_nmi())
> +		return false;
> +
> +	return !!(read_sysreg(isr_el1) & ISR_EL1_IS);
> +}
> +
>  /*
>   * Handle IRQ/context state management when entering from kernel mode.
>   * Before this function is called it is not safe to call regular kernel code,
> @@ -525,8 +533,8 @@ asmlinkage void noinstr el1h_64_sync_handler(struct pt_regs *regs)
>  	arm64_debug_exc_context(CRITICAL_CONTEXT);
>  }
>  
> -static __always_inline void __el1_pnmi(struct pt_regs *regs,
> -				       void (*handler)(struct pt_regs *))
> +static __always_inline void __el1_nmi(struct pt_regs *regs,
> +				      void (*handler)(struct pt_regs *))
>  {
>  	arm64_exc_hwstate_t hwstate;
>  	irqentry_state_t state;
> @@ -545,7 +553,23 @@ static __always_inline void __el1_irq(struct pt_regs *regs,
>  
>  	state = arm64_enter_from_kernel_mode(regs);
>  
> -	arm64_unmask_exc_context(NONMI_CONTEXT);
> +	/*
> +	 * For non-NMI systems, we can switch to NOIRQ context since
> +	 * NMIs cannot occur.
> +	 *
> +	 * For pseudo-NMI, we must keep NONMI context until we can
> +	 * determine the interrupt priority, which is done by the IRQ
> +	 * handler.
> +	 *
> +	 * For FEAT_NMI, we already know the interrupt is an IRQ, so we
> +	 * can switch to NOIRQ context immediately. NMIs do not
> +	 * interfere because they follow a separate handling path and do
> +	 * not share the IRQ handling state.
> +	 */
> +	if (system_uses_irq_prio_masking())
> +		arm64_unmask_exc_context(NONMI_CONTEXT);
> +	else
> +		arm64_unmask_exc_context(NOIRQ_CONTEXT);
>  
>  	irq_enter_rcu();
>  	do_interrupt_handler(regs, handler);
> @@ -565,8 +589,9 @@ static __always_inline void __el1_irq(struct pt_regs *regs,
>  static void noinstr el1_interrupt(struct pt_regs *regs,
>  				  void (*handler)(struct pt_regs *))
>  {
> -	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM64_PSEUDO_NMI) && regs_irqs_disabled(regs))
> -		__el1_pnmi(regs, handler);
> +	/* Is there a NMI to handle? */
> +	if (regs_irqs_disabled(regs) || is_nmi())
> +		__el1_nmi(regs, handler);
>  	else
>  		__el1_irq(regs, handler);
>  
> @@ -580,6 +605,8 @@ asmlinkage void noinstr el1h_64_irq_handler(struct pt_regs *regs)
>  
>  asmlinkage void noinstr el1h_64_fiq_handler(struct pt_regs *regs)
>  {
> +	WARN_ON_ONCE(system_uses_nmi() && (read_sysreg(isr_el1) & ISR_EL1_FS));
> +
>  	el1_interrupt(regs, handle_arch_fiq);
>  }
>  
> @@ -903,20 +930,36 @@ asmlinkage void noinstr el0t_64_sync_handler(struct pt_regs *regs)
>  	arm64_debug_exc_context(CRITICAL_CONTEXT);
>  }
>  
> -static void noinstr el0_interrupt(struct pt_regs *regs,
> -				  void (*handler)(struct pt_regs *))
> +static __always_inline void __el0_nmi(struct pt_regs *regs,
> +				      void (*handler)(struct pt_regs *))
>  {
> -	arm64_enter_from_user_mode(regs);
> +	irqentry_state_t state;
> +	arm64_exc_hwstate_t hwstate;
>  
> -	arm64_unmask_exc_context(NONMI_CONTEXT);
> +	state = irqentry_nmi_enter(regs);
> +	hwstate = arm64_unmask_exc_context(NONMI_CONTEXT);
> +	do_interrupt_handler(regs, handler);
> +	arm64_mask_exc_context(hwstate);
> +	irqentry_nmi_exit(regs, state);
> +}
>  
> -	if (regs->pc & BIT(55))
> -		arm64_apply_bp_hardening();
> +static __always_inline void __el0_irq(struct pt_regs *regs,
> +				      void (*handler)(struct pt_regs *))
> +{
> +	arm64_enter_from_user_mode(regs);
> +	/*
> +	 * For the same reason as in el1_irq() keep NONMI
> +	 * context for pesudo-NMI, and switch to NOIRQ
> +	 * otherwise
> +	 */
> +	if (system_uses_irq_prio_masking())
> +		arm64_unmask_exc_context(NONMI_CONTEXT);
> +	else
> +		arm64_unmask_exc_context(NOIRQ_CONTEXT);
>  
>  	irq_enter_rcu();
>  	do_interrupt_handler(regs, handler);
>  	irq_exit_rcu();
> -
>  	/*
>  	 * For the same reason as in el1_irq() we effectivly
>  	 * have NOIRQ_CONTEXT on return from handler - keep
> @@ -924,6 +967,20 @@ static void noinstr el0_interrupt(struct pt_regs *regs,
>  	 */
>  	arm64_debug_exc_context(NOIRQ_CONTEXT);
>  	arm64_exit_to_user_mode(regs, arm64_exc_hwstate_of_context(NOIRQ_CONTEXT));
> +}
> +
> +static void noinstr el0_interrupt(struct pt_regs *regs,
> +				  void (*handler)(struct pt_regs *))
> +{
> +	if (regs->pc & BIT(55))
> +		arm64_apply_bp_hardening();

It seems only after enter_from_user_mode() or irqentry_nmi_enter(), it
is safe to call normal kernel code.

otherwise LGTM
Reviewed-by: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie at huawei.com>

> +
> +	/* Is there a NMI to handle? */
> +	if (is_nmi())
> +		__el0_nmi(regs, handler);
> +	else
> +		__el0_irq(regs, handler);
> +
>  	arm64_debug_exc_context(CRITICAL_CONTEXT);
>  }
>  
> @@ -939,6 +996,8 @@ asmlinkage void noinstr el0t_64_irq_handler(struct pt_regs *regs)
>  
>  static void noinstr __el0_fiq_handler_common(struct pt_regs *regs)
>  {
> +	WARN_ON_ONCE(system_uses_nmi() && (read_sysreg(isr_el1) & ISR_EL1_FS));
> +
>  	el0_interrupt(regs, handle_arch_fiq);
>  }
>  
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c
> index a3ca6afbf5a2..6e5b673613ca 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c
> @@ -1035,7 +1035,7 @@ static void smp_cross_call(const struct cpumask *target, unsigned int ipinr)
>  
>  static bool ipi_should_be_nmi(enum ipi_msg_type ipi)
>  {
> -	if (!system_uses_irq_prio_masking())
> +	if (!system_uses_nmi() && !system_uses_irq_prio_masking())
>  		return false;
>  
>  	switch (ipi) {




More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list