[PATCH v1 06/11] arm_mpam: Use __ris_msmon_read() for saving MBWU state
Gavin Shan
gshan at redhat.com
Wed Jul 15 21:49:59 PDT 2026
On 7/10/26 9:55 PM, Ben Horgan wrote:
> mbwu_save_mbwu_state() reads the MBWU counters and adds that to a saved
> correction value. However, the type of counter to read is determined by the
> RIS rather than the class and overflow is not taken into account. Fix this
> and mitigate against further divergence by using the same helper as used
> for user reads, __ris_msmon_read().
>
> Fixes: 41e8a14950e1 ("arm_mpam: Track bandwidth counter state for power management")
> Signed-off-by: Ben Horgan <ben.horgan at arm.com>
> ---
> drivers/resctrl/mpam_devices.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++------------
> 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/resctrl/mpam_devices.c b/drivers/resctrl/mpam_devices.c
> index 222fc248067e..a49f426aefc0 100644
> --- a/drivers/resctrl/mpam_devices.c
> +++ b/drivers/resctrl/mpam_devices.c
> @@ -1029,12 +1029,6 @@ struct mon_read {
> bool waited_timeout;
> };
>
> -static bool mpam_ris_has_mbwu_long_counter(struct mpam_msc_ris *ris)
> -{
> - return (mpam_has_feature(mpam_feat_msmon_mbwu_63counter, &ris->props) ||
> - mpam_has_feature(mpam_feat_msmon_mbwu_44counter, &ris->props));
> -}
> -
> static u64 mpam_msc_read_mbwu_l(struct mpam_msc *msc)
> {
> int retry = 3;
> @@ -1687,6 +1681,7 @@ static int mpam_save_mbwu_state(void *arg)
> struct mpam_msc_ris *ris = arg;
> struct msmon_mbwu_state *mbwu_state;
> struct mpam_msc *msc = ris->vmsc->msc;
> + struct mpam_class *class = ris->vmsc->comp->class;
>
> for (i = 0; i < ris->props.num_mbwu_mon; i++) {
> mbwu_state = &ris->mbwu_state[i];
> @@ -1702,18 +1697,32 @@ static int mpam_save_mbwu_state(void *arg)
> cur_flt = mpam_read_monsel_reg(msc, CFG_MBWU_FLT);
> cur_ctl = mpam_read_monsel_reg(msc, CFG_MBWU_CTL);
>
> - if (mpam_ris_has_mbwu_long_counter(ris))
> - val = mpam_msc_read_mbwu_l(msc);
> - else
> - val = mpam_read_monsel_reg(msc, MBWU);
> -
> cfg->mon = i;
> cfg->pmg = FIELD_GET(MSMON_CFG_x_FLT_PMG, cur_flt);
> cfg->match_pmg = FIELD_GET(MSMON_CFG_x_CTL_MATCH_PMG, cur_ctl);
> cfg->partid = FIELD_GET(MSMON_CFG_x_FLT_PARTID, cur_flt);
> - mbwu_state->correction += val;
> mbwu_state->enabled = FIELD_GET(MSMON_CFG_x_CTL_EN, cur_ctl);
> mpam_mon_sel_unlock(msc);
> +
> + if (mbwu_state->enabled) {
> + struct mon_read mbwu_arg = {
> + mbwu_arg.ris = ris,
> + mbwu_arg.ctx = cfg,
> + mbwu_arg.type = mpam_msmon_choose_counter(class),
> + mbwu_arg.val = &val,
> + };
> +
> + val = 0;
> + __ris_msmon_read(&mbwu_arg);
> +
> + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!mpam_mon_sel_lock(msc)))
> + return -EIO;
> +
> + mbwu_state->reset_on_next_read = true;
> + if (!mbwu_arg.err)
> + mbwu_state->correction = val;
> + mpam_mon_sel_unlock(msc);
> + }
> }
The unnecessary nested conditional statement can be avoided by
skipping the disabled MBWU state.
if (!mbwu_state->enabled) {
mpam_mon_sel_unlock(msc);
continue;
}
mpam_mon_sel_unlock(msc);
val = 0;
mbwu_arg.ris = ris;
mbwu_arg.ctx = cfg;
mbwu_arg.type = mpam_msmon_choose_counter(class);
mbwu_arg.val = &val
__ris_msmon_read(&mbwu_arg);
:
:
>
> return 0;
Thanks,
Gavin
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list