[PATCH v4 3/6] KVM: arm64: Add auto DBM support for hardware dirty tracking
Tian Zheng
zhengtian10 at huawei.com
Mon Jul 13 18:14:45 PDT 2026
On 7/13/2026 7:17 PM, Leonardo Bras wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 09, 2026 at 06:40:23PM +0800, Tian Zheng wrote:
>> The DBM (Dirty Bit Modifier) attribute, introduced in ARMv8.1, enables
>> hardware to automatically promote write-clean pages to write-dirty. This
>> prevents the guest from being trapped in EL2 due to missing write
>> permissions.
>>
>> In this design, DBM is controlled by the page-table level flag
>> KVM_PGTABLE_S2_DBM rather than per-PTE software flags. DBM is
>> automatically set for writable non-device pages when the page-table has
>> KVM_PGTABLE_S2_DBM flag, which is determined at MMU init time based on
>> hardware capability.
>>
>> The DBM bit is set in stage2_set_prot_attr() for initial mappings and
>> hugepage splitting, and directly manipulated in
>> kvm_pgtable_stage2_relax_perms() when removing write-protection. On
>> W->RO downgrade, DBM is cleared to prevent hardware from silently
>> upgrading RO+DBM back to W+dirty, which would bypass KVM's write
>> tracking.
>>
>> kvm_pgtable_stage2_pte_prot() does not extract the DBM bit back into
>> enum kvm_pgtable_prot because DBM is a page-table policy determined by
>> pgt->flags, not a per-PTE property. Callers should check
>> pgt->flags & KVM_PGTABLE_S2_DBM instead.
>>
>> This ensures DBM is consistently applied across all PTEs, including
>> during hugepage splitting where child PTEs inherit DBM from the parent
>> block entry via the pgt->flags mechanism.
>>
>> Safety: DBM bit is only interpreted by hardware when VTCR_EL2.HD=1.
>> When HDBSS is not enabled (HD=0), ARM architecture guarantees hardware
>> completely ignores DBM bit in PTEs.
>>
>> Co-developed-by: Eillon <yezhenyu2 at huawei.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Eillon <yezhenyu2 at huawei.com>
>> Co-developed-by: Leonardo Bras <leo.bras at arm.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Leonardo Bras <leo.bras at arm.com>
> Hello Tian,
>
> Have you added the above tags due to this patch being based on the below?
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260629111820.1873540-2-leo.bras@arm.com/
>
> Thanks!
> Leo
Hi Leo,
Yes, I added your Signed-off-by because the DBM-related code in this patch
is based on your implementation in:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260629111820.1873540-2-leo.bras@arm.com/
Thanks!
Tian
>
>> Signed-off-by: Tian Zheng <zhengtian10 at huawei.com>
>> ---
>> arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_pgtable.h | 4 ++++
>> arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>> arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c | 3 +++
>> 3 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_pgtable.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_pgtable.h
>> index 41a8687938eb..5e0fac4bfa53 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_pgtable.h
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_pgtable.h
>> @@ -93,6 +93,8 @@ typedef u64 kvm_pte_t;
>>
>> #define KVM_PTE_LEAF_ATTR_HI_S2_XN GENMASK(54, 53)
>>
>> +#define KVM_PTE_LEAF_ATTR_HI_S2_DBM BIT(51)
>> +
>> #define KVM_PTE_LEAF_ATTR_HI_S1_GP BIT(50)
>>
>> #define KVM_PTE_LEAF_ATTR_S2_PERMS (KVM_PTE_LEAF_ATTR_LO_S2_S2AP_R | \
>> @@ -249,10 +251,12 @@ struct kvm_pgtable_mm_ops {
>> * enum kvm_pgtable_stage2_flags - Stage-2 page-table flags.
>> * @KVM_PGTABLE_S2_IDMAP: Only use identity mappings.
>> * @KVM_PGTABLE_S2_AS_S1: Final memory attributes are that of Stage-1.
>> + * @KVM_PGTABLE_S2_DBM: Hardware-managed DBM for writable pages.
>> */
>> enum kvm_pgtable_stage2_flags {
>> KVM_PGTABLE_S2_IDMAP = BIT(0),
>> KVM_PGTABLE_S2_AS_S1 = BIT(1),
>> + KVM_PGTABLE_S2_DBM = BIT(2),
>> };
>>
>> /**
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c
>> index 91a7dfad6686..21ec456ecc41 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c
>> @@ -731,9 +731,23 @@ static int stage2_set_prot_attr(struct kvm_pgtable *pgt, enum kvm_pgtable_prot p
>> if (prot & KVM_PGTABLE_PROT_R)
>> attr |= KVM_PTE_LEAF_ATTR_LO_S2_S2AP_R;
>>
>> - if (prot & KVM_PGTABLE_PROT_W)
>> + if (prot & KVM_PGTABLE_PROT_W) {
>> attr |= KVM_PTE_LEAF_ATTR_LO_S2_S2AP_W;
>>
>> + /*
>> + * Set DBM bit for writable non-device pages if the page-table
>> + * has KVM_PGTABLE_S2_DBM flag (system supports HDBSS).
>> + *
>> + * For stage 2 translations using Indirect permissions, if the
>> + * Effective value of VTCR_EL2.HD is 0, then dirty state is
>> + * managed by software. Hardware only updates the dirty state
>> + * when VTCR_EL2.HD=1 (HDBSS enabled).
>> + */
>> + if ((pgt->flags & KVM_PGTABLE_S2_DBM) &&
>> + !(prot & KVM_PGTABLE_PROT_DEVICE))
>> + attr |= KVM_PTE_LEAF_ATTR_HI_S2_DBM;
>> + }
>> +
>> if (!kvm_lpa2_is_enabled())
>> attr |= FIELD_PREP(KVM_PTE_LEAF_ATTR_LO_S2_SH, sh);
>>
>> @@ -1367,9 +1381,26 @@ int kvm_pgtable_stage2_relax_perms(struct kvm_pgtable *pgt, u64 addr,
>> if (prot & KVM_PGTABLE_PROT_R)
>> set |= KVM_PTE_LEAF_ATTR_LO_S2_S2AP_R;
>>
>> - if (prot & KVM_PGTABLE_PROT_W)
>> + if (prot & KVM_PGTABLE_PROT_W) {
>> set |= KVM_PTE_LEAF_ATTR_LO_S2_S2AP_W;
>>
>> + /*
>> + * No DEVICE filter needed here: relax_perms is only called
>> + * on FSC_PERM faults. Device pages always get full RW from
>> + * initial mapping and are never write-protected during
>> + * migration, so they never trigger a permission fault.
>> + */
>> + if (pgt->flags & KVM_PGTABLE_S2_DBM)
>> + set |= KVM_PTE_LEAF_ATTR_HI_S2_DBM;
>> + } else {
>> + /*
>> + * Clear DBM on W→RO downgrade to prevent hardware from
>> + * silently upgrading RO+DBM back to W+dirty, which would
>> + * bypass KVM's write tracking and cause data corruption.
>> + */
>> + clr |= KVM_PTE_LEAF_ATTR_HI_S2_DBM;
>> + }
>> +
>> ret = stage2_set_xn_attr(prot, &xn);
>> if (ret)
>> return ret;
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
>> index e086c01a9325..346efed6e605 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
>> @@ -1014,6 +1014,9 @@ int kvm_init_stage2_mmu(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu, unsigned long t
>> if (err)
>> goto out_free_pgtable;
>>
>> + if (system_supports_hdbss())
>> + pgt->flags |= KVM_PGTABLE_S2_DBM;
>> +
>> mmu->pgt = pgt;
>> if (is_protected_kvm_enabled())
>> return 0;
>> --
>> 2.33.0
>>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list