[PATCH v8 5/7] KVM: arm64: PMU: Implement fixed-counters-only emulation
Akihiko Odaki
odaki at rsg.ci.i.u-tokyo.ac.jp
Tue Jul 7 04:23:41 PDT 2026
On 2026/07/07 3:23, Oliver Upton wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 06, 2026 at 07:03:28PM +0900, Akihiko Odaki wrote:
>> Add internal state for PMUv3 emulation without programmable event
>> counters. When fixed-counters-only mode is active, KVM reports no
>> programmable counters and hides PMCEID, avoiding event-counter state
>> whose behavior can depend on the selected hardware PMU.
>>
>> The cycle counter still uses a host perf event. Unlike the normal PMU
>> path, fixed-counters-only mode may create that event from the hardware
>> PMU attached to the VCPU's current pCPU. If the VCPU later loads on a
>> pCPU that is not covered by the existing event's PMU, request a PMU
>> reload so the cycle counter can be recreated against the new pCPU's PMU.
>> Keep this affinity check limited to fixed-counters-only VMs; the normal
>> programmable-counter mode continues to use the VM-wide PMU and does not
>> need per-load reload decisions.
>>
>> Add a separate internal flag for explicit userspace PMU selection. The
>> UAPI wiring added later will use it to keep explicit PMU selection and
>> fixed-counters-only mode mutually exclusive while still allowing
>> fixed-counters-only mode to replace the default PMU selected during
>> KVM_ARM_VCPU_INIT.
>>
>> The UAPI wiring that sets the fixed-counters-only flag and records
>> explicit PMU selection is added later in the series.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Akihiko Odaki <odaki at rsg.ci.i.u-tokyo.ac.jp>
>> ---
>> arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 4 ++++
>> arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c | 1 +
>> arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>> include/kvm/arm_pmu.h | 2 ++
>> 4 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
>> index 0c39d9db7d57..aa07b05b8231 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
>> @@ -353,6 +353,10 @@ struct kvm_arch {
>> #define KVM_ARCH_FLAG_WRITABLE_IMP_ID_REGS 10
>> /* Unhandled SEAs are taken to userspace */
>> #define KVM_ARCH_FLAG_EXIT_SEA 11
>> + /* PMUv3 is emulated with an explicitly specified hardware PMU */
>> +#define KVM_ARCH_FLAG_PMU_V3_EXPLICIT 12
>> + /* PMUv3 is emulated without progammable event counters */
>> +#define KVM_ARCH_FLAG_PMU_V3_FIXED_COUNTERS_ONLY 13
>> unsigned long flags;
>>
>> /* VM-wide vCPU feature set */
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
>> index 68767bb08285..1cc7754d5ace 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
>> @@ -687,6 +687,7 @@ void kvm_arch_vcpu_load(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int cpu)
>> if (has_vhe())
>> kvm_vcpu_load_vhe(vcpu);
>> kvm_arch_vcpu_load_fp(vcpu);
>> + kvm_vcpu_load_pmu(vcpu);
>> kvm_vcpu_pmu_restore_guest(vcpu);
>> if (kvm_arm_is_pvtime_enabled(&vcpu->arch))
>> kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_RECORD_STEAL, vcpu);
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c
>> index e70628653e4b..40cad183376c 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c
>> @@ -96,6 +96,11 @@ u64 kvm_pmu_evtyper_mask(struct kvm *kvm)
>> return mask;
>> }
>>
>> +static bool kvm_pmu_fixed_counters_only(struct kvm *kvm)
>> +{
>> + return test_bit(KVM_ARCH_FLAG_PMU_V3_FIXED_COUNTERS_ONLY, &kvm->arch.flags);
>> +}
>> +
>> /**
>> * kvm_pmc_is_64bit - determine if counter is 64bit
>> * @pmc: counter context
>> @@ -343,7 +348,11 @@ u64 kvm_pmu_implemented_counter_mask(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>>
>> static void kvm_pmc_enable_perf_event(struct kvm_pmc *pmc)
>> {
>> - if (!pmc->perf_event) {
>> + struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu = kvm_pmc_to_vcpu(pmc);
>> +
>> + if (!pmc->perf_event ||
>> + (kvm_pmu_fixed_counters_only(vcpu->kvm) &&
>> + !cpumask_test_cpu(vcpu->cpu, &to_arm_pmu(pmc->perf_event->pmu)->supported_cpus))) {
>> kvm_pmu_create_perf_event(pmc);
>> return;
>> }
>> @@ -720,6 +729,12 @@ static void kvm_pmu_create_perf_event(struct kvm_pmc *pmc)
>> int eventsel;
>> u64 evtreg;
>>
>> + if (kvm_pmu_fixed_counters_only(vcpu->kvm)) {
>> + arm_pmu = kvm_pmu_probe_armpmu(vcpu->cpu);
>> + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!arm_pmu))
>> + return;
>> + }
>> +
>> evtreg = kvm_pmc_read_evtreg(pmc);
>>
>> kvm_pmu_stop_counter(pmc);
>> @@ -748,7 +763,7 @@ static void kvm_pmu_create_perf_event(struct kvm_pmc *pmc)
>> * Don't create an event if we're running on hardware that requires
>> * PMUv3 event translation and we couldn't find a valid mapping.
>> */
>> - eventsel = kvm_map_pmu_event(vcpu->kvm->arch.arm_pmu, eventsel);
>> + eventsel = kvm_map_pmu_event(arm_pmu, eventsel);
>> if (eventsel < 0)
>> return;
>>
>> @@ -878,6 +893,9 @@ u64 kvm_pmu_get_pmceid(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool pmceid1)
>> u64 val, mask = 0;
>> int base, i, nr_events;
>>
>> + if (kvm_pmu_fixed_counters_only(vcpu->kvm))
>> + return 0;
>> +
>
> Even if we advertise bits in PMCEID, does it matter? There's no PMC that
> the guest could use to count it.
>
> I understand it isn't aesthetic but I really want to minimize the
> special-casing that has to be done for this feature.
This strictly ensures that sysregs are stable after migrating across
physical CPUs, which may have different PMCEID values.
>
>> +void kvm_vcpu_load_pmu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>> +{
>> + /*
>> + * ARMV8_PMU_INSTR_IDX will need the same check once
>> + * FEAT_PMUv3_ICNTR is supported.
>> + */
>> + struct kvm_pmc *pmc = kvm_vcpu_idx_to_pmc(vcpu, ARMV8_PMU_CYCLE_IDX);
>> + struct arm_pmu *cpu_pmu;
>> +
>> + if (!kvm_pmu_fixed_counters_only(vcpu->kvm) ||
>> + !kvm_pmu_counter_is_enabled(pmc) || !pmc->perf_event)
>> + return;
>> +
>> + cpu_pmu = to_arm_pmu(pmc->perf_event->pmu);
>> + if (!cpumask_test_cpu(vcpu->cpu, &cpu_pmu->supported_cpus))
>> + kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_RELOAD_PMU, vcpu);
>
> Just detect the changing PMU implementation here, KVM_REQ_RELOAD_PMU
> will need to detect the PMCs that require an update anyway. Stash the
> last cpu in kvm_arch_vcpu_load() and pass it to this:
>
> void kvm_vcpu_load_pmu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int last_cpu)
> {
> if (!kvm_pmu_fixed_counters_only(vcpu->kvm) || vcpu->cpu == last_cpu)
> return;
>
> if (kvm_pmu_probe_armpmu(vcpu->cpu) != kvm_pmu_probe_armpmu(last_cpu))
> kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_RELOAD_PMU);
> }
It is a nice way to simplify the code and to avoid hardcoding
ARMV8_PMU_INSTR_IDX. I'll use the code for the next version.
Regards,
Akihiko Odaki
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list