[PATCH 3/8] drm/msm/a6xx: Add Adreno 722 support

[Akhil P Oommen]

On 7/6/2026 2:29 PM, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> On 7/5/26 10:14 AM, Akhil P Oommen wrote:
>> From: Puranam V G Tejaswi <puranam.tejaswi at oss.qualcomm.com>
>>
>> Add support for Adreno A722, a member of the GEN1 A7xx family. It is
>> derived from A730 and shares the same IP-level configurations: HWCG
>> registers, protected registers, GBIF CX registers and gmu_cgc_mode.
>> Major differences include lower cache/core counts, 1MB GMEM, no
>> Concurrent Binning & LPAC support. Some of the peripheral blocks like
>> RSCC are from A740 that resulted in updates to RSC layout.
>>
>> Add a new entry to the catalog to describe the usual configuration and
>> few additional fixup mainly due to missing CB/LPAC features and updated
>> RSC layout.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Puranam V G Tejaswi <puranam.tejaswi at oss.qualcomm.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Akhil P Oommen <akhilpo at oss.qualcomm.com>
>> ---
> 
> [...]
> 
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.c
>> @@ -710,7 +710,8 @@ static void a6xx_gmu_rpmh_init(struct a6xx_gmu *gmu)
>>  	gmu_write_rscc(gmu, REG_A6XX_RSCC_HIDDEN_TCS_CMD0_DATA + 2, 0);
>>  	gmu_write_rscc(gmu, REG_A6XX_RSCC_HIDDEN_TCS_CMD0_ADDR + 2, 0);
>>  	gmu_write_rscc(gmu, REG_A6XX_RSCC_HIDDEN_TCS_CMD0_DATA + 4,
>> -		       adreno_is_a740_family(adreno_gpu) ? 0x80000021 : 0x80000000);
>> +		       (adreno_is_a740_family(adreno_gpu) ||
>> +			adreno_is_a722(adreno_gpu)) ? 0x80000021 : 0x80000000);
> 
> This is a discrepancy vs kgsl (did you look at gen7_14 instead of
> gen7_17? did you test this on device?)

Both 7_17 and 7_14 are same GPU IP. Yes, this was tested on Eliza MTP.	

> 
> [...]
> 
>>  	/* The second spin of A7xx GPUs messed with some register offsets.. */
>> -	if (adreno_is_a740_family(adreno_gpu))
>> +	if (adreno_is_a740_family(adreno_gpu) || adreno_is_a722(adreno_gpu))
>>  		seqmem0_drv0_reg = REG_A7XX_RSCC_SEQ_MEM_0_DRV0_A740;
> 
> Likewise
> 
> [...]
> 
>>  	/* The second spin of A7xx GPUs messed with some register offsets.. */
>> -	if (adreno_is_a740_family(adreno_gpu) || adreno_is_a8xx(adreno_gpu))
>> +	if (adreno_is_a740_family(adreno_gpu) || adreno_is_a722(adreno_gpu) ||
>> +	    adreno_is_a8xx(adreno_gpu))
>>  		seqmem_off = 4;
> 
> Likewise
> 
>>  
>>  	/* Make sure there are no outstanding RPMh votes */
>> @@ -1100,7 +1104,8 @@ static void a6xx_gmu_rpmh_off(struct a6xx_gmu *gmu)
>>  	gmu_poll_timeout_rscc(gmu, REG_A6XX_RSCC_TCS3_DRV0_STATUS + seqmem_off,
>>  		val, (val & 1), 100, 1000);
>>  
>> -	if (!adreno_is_a740_family(adreno_gpu) && !adreno_is_a8xx(adreno_gpu))
>> +	if (!adreno_is_a740_family(adreno_gpu) && !adreno_is_a722(adreno_gpu) &&
>> +	    !adreno_is_a8xx(adreno_gpu))
>>  		return;
> 
> Likewise
> 
> You also need to if-out concurrent binning for this SKU

You mean the PM4 pkts? If yes, fw will skip them as NOP.

-Akhil.
> 
> Konrad