[PATCH 5/7] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Move the DMA API comment to flush_iotlb_all
Jason Gunthorpe
jgg at nvidia.com
Mon Jul 6 09:29:11 PDT 2026
arm_smmu_tlb_inv_context() is the wrong flush_all for this comment,
it is only called during io-pgtable destruction not during the dma-iommu
operation. Move it to arm_smmu_flush_iotlb_all() which is the flush
that is triggered by the dma-iommu lazy flush thread.
Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg at nvidia.com>
---
drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c | 31 +++++++++++----------
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
index 5087603ea18e62..dd22c0f881bfba 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
@@ -2392,21 +2392,6 @@ static void arm_smmu_tlb_inv_context(void *cookie)
{
struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain = cookie;
- /*
- * If the DMA API is running in non-strict mode then another CPU could
- * have changed the page table and not invoked any flush op. Instead the
- * other CPU will do an atomic_read() and this CPU will have done an
- * atomic_write(). That handshake is enough to acquire the page table
- * writes from the other CPU.
- *
- * All command execution has a dma_wmb() to release all the in-memory
- * structures written by this CPU, that barrier must also release the
- * writes acquired from all the other CPUs too.
- *
- * There are other barriers and atomics on this path, but the above is
- * the essential mechanism for ensuring that HW sees the page table
- * writes from another CPU before it executes the IOTLB invalidation.
- */
arm_smmu_domain_inv(smmu_domain);
}
@@ -4078,6 +4063,22 @@ static void arm_smmu_flush_iotlb_all(struct iommu_domain *domain)
{
struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain = to_smmu_domain(domain);
+ /*
+ * If the DMA API is running in non-strict mode then another CPU could
+ * have changed the page table and not invoked any flush op. Instead the
+ * other CPU will do an atomic_read() and this CPU will have done an
+ * atomic_write(). That handshake is enough to acquire the page table
+ * writes from the other CPU.
+ *
+ * All command execution has a dma_wmb() to release all the in-memory
+ * structures written by this CPU, that barrier must also release the
+ * writes acquired from all the other CPUs too.
+ *
+ * There are other barriers and atomics on this path, but the above is
+ * the essential mechanism for ensuring that HW sees the page table
+ * writes from another CPU before it executes the IOTLB invalidation.
+ */
+
if (smmu_domain->smmu)
arm_smmu_tlb_inv_context(smmu_domain);
}
--
2.43.0
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list