[PATCH 04/12] dt-bindings: soc: fsl: qe: Add support of IRQ in QE GPIO

Krzysztof Kozlowski krzk at kernel.org
Sun Jul 5 23:52:51 PDT 2026


On Fri, Jul 03, 2026 at 03:30:12PM +0200, Paul Louvel wrote:
> Some QE GPIO pins have an associated interrupt line in the QE PIC to
> signal state changes on the pin.  Add the corresponding
> interrupt-controller / nexus properties to the QE GPIO binding.
> 
> Because the GPIO controller does not perform any interrupt handling
> itself, a nexus node (interrupt-map) is used to map each GPIO line
> supporting IRQ to the parent QE PIC interrupt domain.
> 
> As the QE PIC can be configured to generate an interrupt on either a
> high-to-low transition or any change in signal state, three
> interrupt-map entries are needed per GPIO pin that can yield an
> interrupt (falling, both, and the "none" case which defaults to both in
> QE PIC).  This overhead is necessary because the interrupt-map-pass-thru
> property is not part of the DT specification.
> 
> The interrupt-map property is optional: it is not required for GPIO
> banks that have no interrupt capable GPIO line (e.g. port D on MPC8323),
> or when interrupt functionality is not used.
> 
> Update the example to show a scenario where each bank supports a
> different numbers of IRQs, or no IRQs at all.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Paul Louvel <paul.louvel at bootlin.com>
> ---
>  .../bindings/gpio/fsl,mpc8323-qe-pario-bank.yaml   | 69 +++++++++++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 66 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/fsl,mpc8323-qe-pario-bank.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/fsl,mpc8323-qe-pario-bank.yaml
> index 1af99339ff40..0c849a5698f4 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/fsl,mpc8323-qe-pario-bank.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/fsl,mpc8323-qe-pario-bank.yaml
> @@ -27,6 +27,17 @@ properties:
>    "#gpio-cells":
>      const: 2
>  
> +  "#address-cells":
> +    const: 0
> +
> +  "#interrupt-cells":
> +    const: 2
> +

If this has interrupt-cells, then it is a nexus, thus why isn't this
also a "interrupt-controller"?

> +  interrupt-map:
> +    description: |
> +      Specifies the mapping of GPIO lines to the parent interrupt controller, as the
> +      GPIO controller does not do interrupt handling itself.
> +
>  required:
>    - compatible
>    - reg
> @@ -37,9 +48,61 @@ additionalProperties: false
>  
>  examples:
>    - |
> -    gpio-controller at 1400 {
> -        compatible = "fsl,mpc8360-qe-pario-bank", "fsl,mpc8323-qe-pario-bank";
> -        reg = <0x1400 0x18>;

I don't get why you rewrite existing example instead of adding new one.

> +    #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/irq.h>
> +
> +    pic: interrupt-controller {
> +      interrupt-controller;
> +      #address-cells = <0>;
> +      #interrupt-cells = <2>;
> +    };

Drop node, irrelevant.

> +
> +    gpio-controller at 1418 {
> +        #gpio-cells = <2>;
> +        #address-cells = <0>;
> +        #interrupt-cells = <2>;
> +        compatible = "fsl,mpc8323-qe-pario-bank";
> +        reg = <0x1418 0x18>;

And now you are not following DTS coding style.

>          gpio-controller;
> +        interrupt-map = <
> +          7 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING  &pic 4 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING
> +          7 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_BOTH     &pic 4 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_BOTH
> +          7 0                      &pic 4 IRQ_TYPE_NONE
> +
> +          9 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING  &pic 5 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING
> +          9 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_BOTH     &pic 5 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_BOTH
> +          9 0                      &pic 5 IRQ_TYPE_NONE
> +
> +          25 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING &pic 6 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING
> +          25 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_BOTH    &pic 6 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_BOTH
> +          25 0                     &pic 6 IRQ_TYPE_NONE
> +
> +          27 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING &pic 7 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING
> +          27 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_BOTH    &pic 7 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_BOTH
> +          27 0                     &pic 7 IRQ_TYPE_NONE
> +        >;
> +    };
> +
> +    gpio-controller at 1430 {
>          #gpio-cells = <2>;

So two new examples? But old one was wrong?

> +        #address-cells = <0>;
> +        #interrupt-cells = <2>;
> +        compatible = "fsl,mpc8323-qe-pario-bank";
> +        reg = <0x1430 0x18>;
> +        gpio-controller;
> +        interrupt-map = <
> +          24 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING &pic 8 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING
> +          24 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_BOTH    &pic 8 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_BOTH
> +          24 0                     &pic 8 IRQ_TYPE_NONE
> +
> +          29 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING &pic 9 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING
> +          29 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_BOTH    &pic 9 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_BOTH
> +          29 0                     &pic 9 IRQ_TYPE_NONE
> +        >;
> +    };
> +
> +    gpio-controller at 1448 {
> +        #gpio-cells = <2>;
> +        compatible = "fsl,mpc8323-qe-pario-bank";

Wait, three examples? But isn't this the same as previous one?

> +        reg = <0x1448 0x18>;
> +        gpio-controller;
>      };
> 
> -- 
> 2.55.0
> 



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list