[PATCH] dt-bindings: iio: adc: convert Xilinx XADC bindings to YAML

Jonathan Cameron jic23 at kernel.org
Sun Jul 5 16:04:43 PDT 2026


On Sun, 05 Jul 2026 12:44:46 -0500
"Maxwell Doose" <m32285159 at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Sun Jul 5, 2026 at 11:56 AM CDT
> Mikhail Lukianchikov <avermoal at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> >>> Convert the Xilinx XADC binding documentation from .txt to YAML format.
> >>> This conversion is part of the ongoing effort to migrate all DT bindings
> >>> to a machine-verifiable schema.  
> >>
> >>Sorry, but what effort exactly? Where is this effort documented? Do you
> >>have a mentor if this is some sort of mentorship effort?
> >>
> >>And if this is ongoing effort then don't duplicate:
> >>https://lore.kernel.org/all/?q=dfn%3Axilinx-xadc.txt  
> >
> > Hello Krzyszof,
> >
> > Thank you for feedback.
> >
> > I'm the newbie at Linux kernel developers community,
> > and sorry for my mistakes in sending commits.
> >  
> 
> No worries, we've all done it at some point. If you're looking for stuff
> to do then the todo in drivers/iio/ was just recently updated. There are
> still a handful of drivers also in iio that still need conversions to
> guard()().
Tweak that to 'may benefit from'.  I don't want people doing that blindly
with assumption it is always a good idea! :)

> 
> >
> > I'll answer your questions.
> > I am not part of any official mentorship program,
> > I just decided to try to contribute to the development of the Linux kernel.
> > Yes, it's a ongoing effort, and to be honest, this effort is the general
> > community initiative to convert all DT bindings from .txt to .yaml. I didn't know that work
> > on this file was already underway.
> >
> > Tell me, should I continue working in this case?
> >  
> 
> After looking at the link Krzysztof sent you it looks like it's already
> being done, so I'd recommend dropping this one.
> 




More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list