Re: [PATCH v4] KVM: arm64: Record whether pKVM stage 2 mapping is cacheable
Bradley Morgan
include at grrlz.net
Sun Jul 5 07:12:55 PDT 2026
On July 5, 2026 3:08:58 PM GMT+01:00, Dev Jain <dev.jain at arm.com> wrote:
>
>
>On 02/07/26 12:54 am, Bradley Morgan wrote:
>> pKVM keeps its own mapping list for stage 2 operations. Its flush path
>> uses that list directly, so it lost the PTE attribute check done by the
>> generic stage 2 walker.
>>
>> Record whether a mapping is cacheable and skip cache maintenance for
>> mappings that are not cacheable.
>>
>> Fixes: e912efed485a ("KVM: arm64: Introduce the EL1 pKVM MMU")
>
>Is Fixes tag required? If I am reading correctly, Arm ARM says this:
>
>"For VA-based cache maintenance instructions, the instruction operates on
>the
>caches regardless of the memory type and cacheability attributes marked
>for
>the memory address in the VMSA translation table entries. This means that
>the effects of the cache maintenance instructions can apply regardless of:
> Whether the address accessed:
> Is Normal memory or Device memory.
> Has the Cacheable attribute or the Non-cacheable attribute."
>
>So nothing goes wrong if we do dcache clean for non-cacheable memory.
hmmm. Makes sense, fair enough, in V5 I'll also remove the fixes tag
>> Signed-off-by: Bradley Morgan <include at grrlz.net>
>> ---
>> Changes since V3:
>> - addressed some review :)
>>
>> arch/arm64/kvm/pkvm.c | 51 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
>> 1 file changed, 41 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/pkvm.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/pkvm.c
>> index 053e4f733e4b..6d1cad890c7e 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/pkvm.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/pkvm.c
>> @@ -302,9 +302,32 @@ static u64 __pkvm_mapping_start(struct pkvm_mapping
>*m)
>> return m->gfn * PAGE_SIZE;
>> }
>>
>> +#define PKVM_MAPPING_NR_PAGES_MASK GENMASK_ULL(47, 0)
>> +#define PKVM_MAPPING_NC BIT_ULL(48)
>> +
>> +static u64 pkvm_mapping_nr_pages(struct pkvm_mapping *m)
>> +{
>> + return m->nr_pages & PKVM_MAPPING_NR_PAGES_MASK;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static bool pkvm_mapping_is_nc(struct pkvm_mapping *m)
>> +{
>> + return m->nr_pages & PKVM_MAPPING_NC;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void pkvm_mapping_set_nr_pages(struct pkvm_mapping *m, u64
>nr_pages,
>> + bool nc)
>> +{
>> + WARN_ON_ONCE(nr_pages & ~PKVM_MAPPING_NR_PAGES_MASK);
>> +
>> + m->nr_pages = nr_pages & PKVM_MAPPING_NR_PAGES_MASK;
>> + if (nc)
>> + m->nr_pages |= PKVM_MAPPING_NC;
>> +}
>> +
>> static u64 __pkvm_mapping_end(struct pkvm_mapping *m)
>> {
>> - return (m->gfn + m->nr_pages) * PAGE_SIZE - 1;
>> + return (m->gfn + pkvm_mapping_nr_pages(m)) * PAGE_SIZE - 1;
>> }
>>
>> INTERVAL_TREE_DEFINE(struct pkvm_mapping, node, u64, __subtree_last,
>> @@ -350,7 +373,7 @@ static int __pkvm_pgtable_stage2_reclaim(struct
>kvm_pgtable *pgt, u64 start, u64
>> continue;
>>
>> page = pfn_to_page(mapping->pfn);
>> - WARN_ON_ONCE(mapping->nr_pages != 1);
>> + WARN_ON_ONCE(pkvm_mapping_nr_pages(mapping) != 1);
>> unpin_user_pages_dirty_lock(&page, 1, true);
>> account_locked_vm(current->mm, 1, false);
>> pkvm_mapping_remove(mapping, &pgt->pkvm_mappings);
>> @@ -369,7 +392,7 @@ static int __pkvm_pgtable_stage2_unshare(struct
>kvm_pgtable *pgt, u64 start, u64
>>
>> for_each_mapping_in_range_safe(pgt, start, end, mapping) {
>> ret = kvm_call_hyp_nvhe(__pkvm_host_unshare_guest, handle, mapping->gfn,
>> - mapping->nr_pages);
>> + pkvm_mapping_nr_pages(mapping));
>> if (WARN_ON(ret))
>> return ret;
>> pkvm_mapping_remove(mapping, &pgt->pkvm_mappings);
>> @@ -448,7 +471,7 @@ int pkvm_pgtable_stage2_map(struct kvm_pgtable *pgt,
>u64 addr, u64 size,
>> * permission faults are handled in the relax_perms() path.
>> */
>> if (mapping) {
>> - if (size == (mapping->nr_pages * PAGE_SIZE))
>> + if (size == (pkvm_mapping_nr_pages(mapping) * PAGE_SIZE))
>> return -EAGAIN;
>>
>> /*
>> @@ -472,7 +495,9 @@ int pkvm_pgtable_stage2_map(struct kvm_pgtable *pgt,
>u64 addr, u64 size,
>> swap(mapping, cache->mapping);
>> mapping->gfn = gfn;
>> mapping->pfn = pfn;
>> - mapping->nr_pages = size / PAGE_SIZE;
>> + pkvm_mapping_set_nr_pages(mapping, size / PAGE_SIZE,
>> + (prot & (KVM_PGTABLE_PROT_DEVICE |
>> + KVM_PGTABLE_PROT_NORMAL_NC)));
>> pkvm_mapping_insert(mapping, &pgt->pkvm_mappings);
>>
>> return ret;
>> @@ -503,7 +528,7 @@ int pkvm_pgtable_stage2_wrprotect(struct kvm_pgtable
>*pgt, u64 addr, u64 size)
>> lockdep_assert_held(&kvm->mmu_lock);
>> for_each_mapping_in_range_safe(pgt, addr, addr + size, mapping) {
>> ret = kvm_call_hyp_nvhe(__pkvm_host_wrprotect_guest, handle, mapping->gfn,
>> - mapping->nr_pages);
>> + pkvm_mapping_nr_pages(mapping));
>> if (WARN_ON(ret))
>> break;
>> }
>> @@ -517,9 +542,13 @@ int pkvm_pgtable_stage2_flush(struct kvm_pgtable
>*pgt, u64 addr, u64 size)
>> struct pkvm_mapping *mapping;
>>
>> lockdep_assert_held(&kvm->mmu_lock);
>> - for_each_mapping_in_range_safe(pgt, addr, addr + size, mapping)
>> + for_each_mapping_in_range_safe(pgt, addr, addr + size, mapping) {
>> + if (pkvm_mapping_is_nc(mapping))
>> + continue;
>> +
>> __clean_dcache_guest_page(pfn_to_kaddr(mapping->pfn),
>> - PAGE_SIZE * mapping->nr_pages);
>> + PAGE_SIZE * pkvm_mapping_nr_pages(mapping));
>> + }
>>
>> return 0;
>> }
>> @@ -536,8 +565,10 @@ bool pkvm_pgtable_stage2_test_clear_young(struct
>kvm_pgtable *pgt, u64 addr, u64
>>
>> lockdep_assert_held(&kvm->mmu_lock);
>> for_each_mapping_in_range_safe(pgt, addr, addr + size, mapping)
>> - young |= kvm_call_hyp_nvhe(__pkvm_host_test_clear_young_guest, handle, mapping->gfn,
>> - mapping->nr_pages, mkold);
>> + young |= kvm_call_hyp_nvhe(__pkvm_host_test_clear_young_guest,
>> + handle, mapping->gfn,
>> + pkvm_mapping_nr_pages(mapping),
>> + mkold);
>>
>> return young;
>> }
>
>
Thanks!
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list