[PATCH v2 02/15] arm_mpam: propagate MSC read errors for wrapper functions

Ben Horgan ben.horgan at arm.com
Wed Jul 1 12:56:53 PDT 2026


Hi Andre,

On 7/2/26 17:22, Andre Przywara wrote:
> Allow the wrapper functions for IDR and ESR accesses to return an
> error, and propagate read errors from the lower level up.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara at arm.com>
> ---
>  drivers/resctrl/mpam_devices.c | 51 +++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
>  1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/resctrl/mpam_devices.c b/drivers/resctrl/mpam_devices.c
> index df14b4513382..ce8738adb6ff 100644
> --- a/drivers/resctrl/mpam_devices.c
> +++ b/drivers/resctrl/mpam_devices.c
> @@ -247,27 +247,34 @@ static bool mpam_msc_check_aidr(struct mpam_msc *msc)
>  	return true;
>  }
>  
> -static u64 mpam_msc_read_idr(struct mpam_msc *msc)
> +static int mpam_msc_read_idr(struct mpam_msc *msc, u64 *res)
>  {
>  	u32 idr_high = 0, idr_low;
> +	int ret;
>  
>  	lockdep_assert_held(&msc->part_sel_lock);
>  
> -	mpam_read_partsel_reg(msc, IDR, &idr_low);
> -	if (FIELD_GET(MPAMF_IDR_EXT, idr_low))
> -		mpam_read_partsel_reg(msc, IDR + 4, &idr_high);
> +	ret = mpam_read_partsel_reg(msc, IDR, &idr_low);
> +	if (!ret && FIELD_GET(MPAMF_IDR_EXT, idr_low))
> +		ret = mpam_read_partsel_reg(msc, IDR + 4, &idr_high);
>  
> -	return ((u64)idr_high << 32) | idr_low;
> +	if (!ret)
> +		*res = ((u64)idr_high << 32) | idr_low;
> +
> +	return ret;
>  }

Why does the pattern here, use of !ret rather than early return, differ
from the one you've used in mpam_msc_read_esr()?

Thanks,

Ben

>  
> -static void mpam_msc_clear_esr(struct mpam_msc *msc)
> +static int mpam_msc_clear_esr(struct mpam_msc *msc)
>  {
>  	u32 esr_low;
> +	int ret;
>  
> -	__mpam_read_reg(msc, MPAMF_ESR, &esr_low);
> +	ret = __mpam_read_reg(msc, MPAMF_ESR, &esr_low);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
>  
>  	if (!esr_low)
> -		return;
> +		return 0;
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * Clearing the high/low bits of MPAMF_ESR can not be atomic.
> @@ -277,18 +284,30 @@ static void mpam_msc_clear_esr(struct mpam_msc *msc)
>  	 */
>  	if (msc->has_extd_esr)
>  		__mpam_write_reg(msc, MPAMF_ESR + 4, 0);
> +
>  	__mpam_write_reg(msc, MPAMF_ESR, 0);
> +
> +	return 0;
>  }
>  
> -static u64 mpam_msc_read_esr(struct mpam_msc *msc)
> +static int mpam_msc_read_esr(struct mpam_msc *msc, u64 *res)
>  {
>  	u32 esr_high = 0, esr_low;
> +	int ret;
>  
> -	__mpam_read_reg(msc, MPAMF_ESR, &esr_low);
> -	if (msc->has_extd_esr)
> -		__mpam_read_reg(msc, MPAMF_ESR + 4, &esr_high);
> +	ret = __mpam_read_reg(msc, MPAMF_ESR, &esr_low);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	if (msc->has_extd_esr) {
> +		ret = __mpam_read_reg(msc, MPAMF_ESR + 4, &esr_high);
> +		if (ret)
> +			return ret;
> +	}
>  
> -	return ((u64)esr_high << 32) | esr_low;
> +	*res = ((u64)esr_high << 32) | esr_low;
> +
> +	return 0;
>  }
>  
>  static void __mpam_part_sel_raw(u32 partsel, struct mpam_msc *msc)
> @@ -993,7 +1012,7 @@ static int mpam_msc_hw_probe(struct mpam_msc *msc)
>  
>  	/* Grab an IDR value to find out how many RIS there are */
>  	mutex_lock(&msc->part_sel_lock);
> -	idr = mpam_msc_read_idr(msc);
> +	mpam_msc_read_idr(msc, &idr);
>  	mpam_read_partsel_reg(msc, IIDR, &msc->iidr);
>  
>  	mutex_unlock(&msc->part_sel_lock);
> @@ -1009,7 +1028,7 @@ static int mpam_msc_hw_probe(struct mpam_msc *msc)
>  	for (ris_idx = 0; ris_idx <= msc->ris_max; ris_idx++) {
>  		mutex_lock(&msc->part_sel_lock);
>  		__mpam_part_sel(ris_idx, 0, msc);
> -		idr = mpam_msc_read_idr(msc);
> +		mpam_msc_read_idr(msc, &idr);
>  		mutex_unlock(&msc->part_sel_lock);
>  
>  		partid_max = FIELD_GET(MPAMF_IDR_PARTID_MAX, idr);
> @@ -2492,7 +2511,7 @@ static irqreturn_t __mpam_irq_handler(int irq, struct mpam_msc *msc)
>  					   &msc->accessibility)))
>  		return IRQ_NONE;
>  
> -	reg = mpam_msc_read_esr(msc);
> +	mpam_msc_read_esr(msc, &reg);
>  
>  	errcode = FIELD_GET(MPAMF_ESR_ERRCODE, reg);
>  	if (!errcode)




More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list