[PATCH 21/28] KVM: arm64: Add NVHCR_EL2 handling to the sysreg array
Marc Zyngier
maz at kernel.org
Thu Jul 2 09:02:41 PDT 2026
Expose NVHCR_EL2 to userspace, and treat the direct access as UNDEF,
as that would only outline a bug in our exception routing.
The generic accessors are also updated to deal with the relatively
uncommon location of that register.
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz at kernel.org>
---
arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 28 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
index 9439c5b2b1fe8..0aeb2e736fde3 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
@@ -221,6 +221,20 @@ static void locate_register(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, enum vcpu_sysreg reg,
if (is_hyp_ctxt(vcpu) && vcpu_el2_e2h_is_set(vcpu))
loc->loc = SR_LOC_SPECIAL;
break;
+ case NVHCR_EL2:
+ /*
+ * Yes, NVHCR_EL2 maps to itself when loaded in nested
+ * context. If you feel like the architecture is double
+ * backing on itself upside down, you're not alone.
+ */
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(!kvm_has_nv3(vcpu->kvm));
+ if (is_hyp_ctxt(vcpu)) {
+ loc->loc = SR_LOC_MEMORY;
+ } else {
+ loc->loc = SR_LOC_LOADED | SR_LOC_MAPPED;
+ loc->map_reg = NVHCR_EL2;
+ }
+ break;
default:
loc->loc = locate_direct_register(vcpu, reg);
}
@@ -260,6 +274,7 @@ static u64 read_sr_from_cpu(enum vcpu_sysreg reg)
case DACR32_EL2: val = read_sysreg_s(SYS_DACR32_EL2); break;
case IFSR32_EL2: val = read_sysreg_s(SYS_IFSR32_EL2); break;
case DBGVCR32_EL2: val = read_sysreg_s(SYS_DBGVCR32_EL2); break;
+ case NVHCR_EL2: val = read_sysreg_s(SYS_NVHCR_EL2); break;
default: WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
}
@@ -298,6 +313,7 @@ static void write_sr_to_cpu(enum vcpu_sysreg reg, u64 val)
case DACR32_EL2: write_sysreg_s(val, SYS_DACR32_EL2); break;
case IFSR32_EL2: write_sysreg_s(val, SYS_IFSR32_EL2); break;
case DBGVCR32_EL2: write_sysreg_s(val, SYS_DBGVCR32_EL2); break;
+ case NVHCR_EL2: write_sysreg_s(val, SYS_NVHCR_EL2); break;
default: WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
}
}
@@ -2861,6 +2877,16 @@ static unsigned int vncr_el2_visibility(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
return REG_HIDDEN;
}
+static unsigned int nvhcr_el2_visibility(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
+ const struct sys_reg_desc *rd)
+{
+ if (el2_visibility(vcpu, rd) == 0 &&
+ kvm_has_feat(vcpu->kvm, ID_AA64MMFR4_EL1, NV_frac, NV3))
+ return 0;
+
+ return REG_HIDDEN;
+}
+
static unsigned int sctlr2_visibility(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
const struct sys_reg_desc *rd)
{
@@ -3774,6 +3800,8 @@ static const struct sys_reg_desc sys_reg_descs[] = {
sve_el2_visibility),
EL2_REG_VNCR(HCRX_EL2, reset_val, 0),
+ EL2_REG_FILTERED(NVHCR_EL2, undef_access, reset_val, 0,
+ nvhcr_el2_visibility),
EL2_REG(TTBR0_EL2, access_rw, reset_val, 0),
EL2_REG(TTBR1_EL2, access_rw, reset_val, 0),
--
2.47.3
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list