[PATCH v2 6/6] mm/mprotect: use huge_ptep_get() for hugetlb
Dev Jain
dev.jain at arm.com
Wed Jul 1 22:18:14 PDT 2026
On 02/07/26 10:43 am, Dev Jain wrote:
> prot_none_hugetlb_entry() is the hugetlb callback for the early
> mprotect(PROT_NONE) PFN permission walk on x86.
>
> The callback passes the decoded PFN to pfn_modify_allowed(). For a
> hugetlb callback, the pte pointer refers to a hugetlb entry. On
> architectures where hugetlb entries need huge_ptep_get(), reading that
> entry with ptep_get() can make the permission check use the wrong PFN.
>
> Use huge_ptep_get() before decoding the hugetlb PFN.
>
> Currently there is no path which can trigger a bug: huge_ptep_get() is a
> simple ptep_get() for x86, and the prot_none walk occurs only for x86.
>
> So no need to backport - use the correct helper anyways.
>
> Fixes: 42e4089c7890 ("x86/speculation/l1tf: Disallow non privileged high MMIO PROT_NONE mappings")
> Signed-off-by: Dev Jain <dev.jain at arm.com>
> ---
@Muchun, I did not do the change you suggested: if we do #ifdef around
the hugetlb callback, then for CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE=n, prot_none_hugetlb_entry()
is defined but not used, giving compile error.
> mm/mprotect.c | 8 +++++++-
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/mprotect.c b/mm/mprotect.c
> index 9cbf932b028cf..23779632d18bf 100644
> --- a/mm/mprotect.c
> +++ b/mm/mprotect.c
> @@ -699,14 +699,20 @@ static int prot_none_pte_entry(pte_t *pte, unsigned long addr,
> 0 : -EACCES;
> }
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE
> static int prot_none_hugetlb_entry(pte_t *pte, unsigned long hmask,
> unsigned long addr, unsigned long next,
> struct mm_walk *walk)
> {
> - return pfn_modify_allowed(pte_pfn(ptep_get(pte)),
> + pte_t entry = huge_ptep_get(walk->mm, addr, pte);
> +
> + return pfn_modify_allowed(pte_pfn(entry),
> *(pgprot_t *)(walk->private)) ?
> 0 : -EACCES;
> }
> +#else
> +#define prot_none_hugetlb_entry NULL
> +#endif
>
> static int prot_none_test(unsigned long addr, unsigned long next,
> struct mm_walk *walk)
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list