[PATCH v4 0/3] Fix bugs and performance of kstack offset randomisation
Dave Hansen
dave.hansen at intel.com
Mon Jan 19 08:00:00 PST 2026
On 1/19/26 05:01, Ryan Roberts wrote:
> x86 (AWS Sapphire Rapids):
> +-----------------+--------------+-------------+---------------+
> | Benchmark | Result Class | v6.18-rc5 | per-task-prng |
> | | | rndstack-on | |
> | | | | |
> +=================+==============+=============+===============+
> | syscall/getpid | mean (ns) | (R) 13.32% | (R) 4.60% |
> | | p99 (ns) | (R) 13.38% | (R) 18.08% |
> | | p99.9 (ns) | 16.26% | (R) 19.38% |
Like you noted, this is surprising. This would be a good thing to make
sure it goes in very early after -rc1 and gets plenty of wide testing.
But I don't see any problems with the approach, and the move to common
code looks like a big win as well:
Acked-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen at linux.intel.com>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list