[PATCH 1/3] cpufreq: dt-platdev: Add ti,am62l3 to blocklist

[Dhruva Gole]

On Jan 16, 2026 at 10:16:08 +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 16/01/2026 10:01, Dhruva Gole wrote:
> > Add AM62L3 SoC to the dt-platdev blocklist to ensure proper handling
> > of CPUFreq functionality. The AM62L3 will use its native TI CPUFreq
> > driver implementation instead of the generic dt-platdev driver.
> > 
> > This follows the same pattern as other TI SoCs like AM62A7, AM62D2,
> > and AM62P5 which have been previously added to this blocklist.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Dhruva Gole <d-gole at ti.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt-platdev.c | 1 +
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt-platdev.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt-platdev.c
> > index 1708179b2610bca6035d10f0f4766eee6f73912e..29122bac2e22f6e7a8e8294cc01923c8a13d53c1 100644
> > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt-platdev.c
> > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt-platdev.c
> > @@ -194,6 +194,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id blocklist[] __initconst = {
> >  	{ .compatible = "ti,am62a7", },
> >  	{ .compatible = "ti,am62d2", },
> >  	{ .compatible = "ti,am62p5", },
> > +	{ .compatible = "ti,am62l3", },
> 
> p > l

Fair point, I thought more from a "latest SOC" point of view but the
standard here is alphabetical, will re-spin.

> 
> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof

-- 
Best regards,
Dhruva Gole
Texas Instruments Incorporated