[PATCH v10 7/7] qcom-tgu: Add reset node to initialize
Konrad Dybcio
konrad.dybcio at oss.qualcomm.com
Tue Jan 13 03:22:28 PST 2026
On 1/9/26 3:11 AM, Songwei Chai wrote:
> Add reset node to initialize the value of
> priority/condition_decode/condition_select/timer/counter nodes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Songwei Chai <songwei.chai at oss.qualcomm.com>
> ---
[...]
> +/* reset_tgu_store - Reset Trace and Gating Unit (TGU) configuration. */
> +static ssize_t reset_tgu_store(struct device *dev,
> + struct device_attribute *attr, const char *buf,
> + size_t size)
> +{
> + struct tgu_drvdata *drvdata = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> + unsigned long value;
> + int i, j, ret;
> +
> + if (kstrtoul(buf, 0, &value) || value == 0)
> + return -EINVAL;
Your documentation blurb promises that only 1 is accepted, but this is not
the case. I think the previous additions had a similar flaw
> +
> + if (!drvdata->enable) {
I think this check needs to be made under a lock, otherwise something else
may pull the plug inbetween
> + ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(drvdata->dev);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + pm_runtime_put(drvdata->dev);
> + return ret;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + guard(spinlock)(&drvdata->lock);
> + TGU_UNLOCK(drvdata->base);
> +
> + writel(0, drvdata->base + TGU_CONTROL);
> +
> + TGU_LOCK(drvdata->base);
This is tgu_disable()
> +
> + if (drvdata->value_table->priority)
> + memset(drvdata->value_table->priority, 0,
> + MAX_PRIORITY * drvdata->max_step *
> + drvdata->max_reg * sizeof(unsigned int));
> +
> + if (drvdata->value_table->condition_decode)
> + memset(drvdata->value_table->condition_decode, 0,
> + drvdata->max_condition_decode * drvdata->max_step *
> + sizeof(unsigned int));
> +
> + /* Initialize all condition registers to NOT(value=0x1000000) */
One \t too much
> + for (i = 0; i < drvdata->max_step; i++) {
> + for (j = 0; j < drvdata->max_condition_decode; j++) {
> + drvdata->value_table
> + ->condition_decode[calculate_array_location(
> + drvdata, i, TGU_CONDITION_DECODE, j)] =
> + 0x1000000;
This is unreadable, take a pointer to condition_decode[]
> + }
> + }
> +
> + if (drvdata->value_table->condition_select)
> + memset(drvdata->value_table->condition_select, 0,
> + drvdata->max_condition_select * drvdata->max_step *
> + sizeof(unsigned int));
> +
> + if (drvdata->value_table->timer)
> + memset(drvdata->value_table->timer, 0,
> + (drvdata->max_step) *
> + (drvdata->max_timer) *
> + sizeof(unsigned int));
> +
> + if (drvdata->value_table->counter)
> + memset(drvdata->value_table->counter, 0,
> + (drvdata->max_step) *
> + (drvdata->max_counter) *
> + sizeof(unsigned int));
This is similarly difficult to read with almost random indentation
Konrad
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list