[PATCH] irqchip/gic-v3-its: Don't acquire rt_spin_lock in allocate_vpe_l1_table()

[Thomas Gleixner]

On Thu, Jan 08 2026 at 08:26, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> Err, no. That's horrible. I can see three ways to address this in a
> more appealing way:
>
> - you give RT a generic allocator that works for (small) atomic
>   allocations. I appreciate that's not easy, and even probably
>   contrary to the RT goals. But I'm also pretty sure that the GIC code
>   is not the only pile of crap being caught doing that.
>
> - you pre-compute upfront how many cpumasks you are going to require,
>   based on the actual GIC topology. You do that on CPU0, outside of
>   the hotplug constraints, and allocate what you need. This is
>   difficult as you need to ensure the RD<->CPU matching without the
>   CPUs having booted, which means wading through the DT/ACPI gunk to
>   try and guess what you have.
>
> - you delay the allocation of L1 tables to a context where you can
>   perform allocations, and before we have a chance of running a guest
>   on this CPU. That's probably the simplest option (though dealing
>   with late onlining while guests are already running could be
>   interesting...).

At the point where a CPU is brought up, the topology should be known
already, which means this can be allocated on the control CPU _before_
the new CPU comes up, no?

Thanks,

        tglx