[PATCH v2 6/6] arm64: dts: st: Add boot phase tags for STMicroelectronics mp2 boards

[Patrice CHOTARD]

On 1/8/26 17:16, Alexandre TORGUE wrote:
> Hi Patrice
> 
> On 11/14/25 18:26, Patrice Chotard wrote:
>> The bootph-all flag was introduced in dt-schema
>> (dtschema/schemas/bootph.yaml) to define node usage across
>> different boot phases.
>>
>> To ensure SD boot, timer, gpio, syscfg, clock and uart nodes need to be
>> present in all boot stages, so add missing bootph-all phase flag
>> to these nodes to support SD boot.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Patrice Chotard <patrice.chotard at foss.st.com>
>> ---
>>   arch/arm64/boot/dts/st/stm32mp211.dtsi     |  7 +++++++
>>   arch/arm64/boot/dts/st/stm32mp215f-dk.dts  |  1 +
>>   arch/arm64/boot/dts/st/stm32mp231.dtsi     | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>>   arch/arm64/boot/dts/st/stm32mp235f-dk.dts  | 11 +++++++++++
>>   arch/arm64/boot/dts/st/stm32mp251.dtsi     | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>   arch/arm64/boot/dts/st/stm32mp255.dtsi     |  3 ++-
>>   arch/arm64/boot/dts/st/stm32mp257f-dk.dts  | 11 +++++++++++
>>   arch/arm64/boot/dts/st/stm32mp257f-ev1.dts | 11 +++++++++++
>>   8 files changed, 91 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
> 
> ....
> 
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/st/stm32mp251.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/st/stm32mp251.dtsi
>> index a8e6e0f77b83..f6576304f42f 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/st/stm32mp251.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/st/stm32mp251.dtsi
>> @@ -66,6 +66,7 @@ optee: optee {
> 
> ...
> 
> 
>>                 ltdc: display-controller at 48010000 {
>> +                bootph-all;
>>                   compatible = "st,stm32mp251-ltdc";
>>                   reg = <0x48010000 0x400>;
>>                   interrupts = <GIC_SPI 158 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
>> @@ -1577,6 +1585,7 @@ ltdc: display-controller at 48010000 {
>>                   clock-names = "lcd", "bus";
>>                   resets = <&rcc LTDC_R>;
>>                   access-controllers = <&rifsc 80>;
>> +                bootph-all;
> 
> duplicate property = build issue.

Argh, sorry, i didn't see this issue as i only build for 32 bits platforms ....

I resent a v3 ASAP.

Thanks
Patrice


> 
> 
>>                   status = "disabled";
>>               };
>>   
> 
>