[PATCH rc v5 1/4] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Add update_safe bits to fix STE update sequence
Jason Gunthorpe
jgg at nvidia.com
Wed Jan 7 16:36:46 PST 2026
On Wed, Jan 07, 2026 at 09:20:06PM +0000, Will Deacon wrote:
> > drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.h | 2 ++
> > .../iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3-test.c | 18 ++++++++++---
> > drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c | 27 ++++++++++++++-----
> > 3 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> Hmm. So this appears to ignore the safe bits entirely, whereas the
> rationale for the change is that going from {MEV,EATS} disabled to
> enabled is safe (which I agree with).
The argument was it doesn't matter for either direction be it disabled
to enabled or vice versa, see my reply to Mustfa in the v4 posting:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20251218180129.GA254720@nvidia.com/
> So what prevents an erroneous hitless STE update when going from
> {MEV,EATS} enabled to disabled after this change?
Nothing, it isn't erroneous.
Jason
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list