[PATCH v2 2/2] arm64: dts: rockchip: Add rk3576 evb2 board
Heiko Stübner
heiko at sntech.de
Wed Jan 7 00:21:06 PST 2026
Am Mittwoch, 7. Januar 2026, 08:56:04 Mitteleuropäische Normalzeit schrieb Alexey Charkov:
> Hi Chaoyi,
>
> On Wed, Jan 7, 2026 at 11:04 AM Chaoyi Chen <kernel at airkyi.com> wrote:
> >
> > From: Chaoyi Chen <chaoyi.chen at rock-chips.com>
> >
> > General features for rk3576 evb2 board:
> > - Rockchip RK3576
> > - LPDDR4/4X
> > - eMMC5.1
> > - RK806-2x2pcs + DiscretePower
> > - 1x HDMI2.1 TX / HDMI2.0 RX
> > - 1x full size DP1.4 TX (Only 2 Lanes)
> > - 2x 10/100/1000M Ethernet
> > - 5x SATA3.0 7Pin Slot
> > - 2x USB3.2 Gen1 Host
> > - 3x USB2.0 Host
> > - WIFI/BT
> > - ...
> >
> > Tested with eMMC/SDMMC/HDMI/USB/Ethernet/WIFI/BT module.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Chaoyi Chen <chaoyi.chen at rock-chips.com>
[...]
> > + vbus5v0_typec: regulator-vbus5v0-typec {
> > + compatible = "regulator-fixed";
> > + regulator-name = "vbus5v0_typec";
>
> This might better be renamed, given that last time you mentioned this
> board doesn't have a Type-C connector. Perhaps regulator-vbus5v0-otg?
Alternatively a comment above it.
I.e. regulator-naming should always follow the naming used in the
schematics, so that it gets easier to reference between schematics
and devicetree.
> > + regulator-min-microvolt = <5000000>;
> > + regulator-max-microvolt = <5000000>;
> > + enable-active-high;
> > + gpio = <&gpio0 RK_PD1 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
> > + vin-supply = <&vcc5v0_device>;
> > + pinctrl-names = "default";
> > + pinctrl-0 = <&usb_otg0_pwren>;
> > + };
> > +
> > + vcc12v_dcin: regulator-vcc12v-dcin {
> > + compatible = "regulator-fixed";
> > + regulator-name = "vcc12v_dcin";
> > + regulator-always-on;
> > + regulator-boot-on;
> > + regulator-min-microvolt = <12000000>;
> > + regulator-max-microvolt = <12000000>;
> > + };
> > +
> > + vcc1v2_ufs_vccq_s0: regulator-vcc1v2-ufs-vccq-s0 {
> > + compatible = "regulator-fixed";
> > + regulator-name = "vcc1v2_ufs_vccq_s0";
> > + regulator-boot-on;
> > + regulator-always-on;
> > + regulator-min-microvolt = <1200000>;
> > + regulator-max-microvolt = <1200000>;
> > + vin-supply = <&vcc_sys>;
> > + };
> > +
> > + vcc1v8_ufs_vccq2_s0: regulator-vcc1v8-ufs-vccq2-s0 {
> > + compatible = "regulator-fixed";
> > + regulator-name = "vcc1v8_ufs_vccq2_s0";
> > + regulator-boot-on;
> > + regulator-always-on;
> > + regulator-min-microvolt = <1800000>;
> > + regulator-max-microvolt = <1800000>;
> > + vin-supply = <&vcc_1v8_s3>;
> > + };
> > +
> > + vcc3v3_hubreset: vcc3v3-hubreset {
> > + compatible = "regulator-fixed";
> > + regulator-name = "vcc3v3_hubreset";
> > + regulator-boot-on;
> > + regulator-always-on;
>
> If this regulator supplies a soldered-on discrete hub and is required
> to power it up, won't it be better to describe the hub in the device
> tree (see binding at [1]), make the regulator its supply, and perhaps
> drop the "regulator-boot-on/regulator-always-on" annotation here,
> letting the regulator core deal with its enabling instead?
>
> [1] https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/usb-device.yaml
Yep, it would be nicer to it this way.
A live example can be found in the Rock 5 ITX [2]
[2] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588-rock-5-itx.dts#n1266
Heiko
> [snip]
>
> Other than these, LGTM - thanks for addressing my comments from v1!
> Feel free to include my:
>
> Reviewed-by: Alexey Charkov <alchark at gmail.com>
>
> Best regards,
> Alexey
>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list