[PATCH v2 37/45] arm_mpam: resctrl: Add empty definitions for assorted resctrl functions
Jonathan Cameron
jonathan.cameron at huawei.com
Tue Jan 6 06:48:35 PST 2026
On Fri, 19 Dec 2025 18:11:39 +0000
Ben Horgan <ben.horgan at arm.com> wrote:
> From: James Morse <james.morse at arm.com>
>
> A few resctrl features and hooks need to be provided, but aren't needed or
> supported on MPAM platforms.
>
> resctrl has individual hooks to separately enable and disable the
> closid/partid and rmid/pmg context switching code. For MPAM this is all the
> same thing, as the value in struct task_struct is used to cache the value
> that should be written to hardware. arm64's context switching code is
> enabled once MPAM is usable, but doesn't touch the hardware unless the
> value has changed.
>
> For now event configuration is not supported, and can be turned off by
> returning 'false' from resctrl_arch_is_evt_configurable().
>
> The new io_alloc feature is not supported either, always return false from
> the enable helper to indicate and fail the enable.
>
> Add this, and empty definitions for the other hooks.
>
> Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse at arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ben Horgan <ben.horgan at arm.com>
FWIW given I didn't check what these all are, just that they are indeed
stubs that do the obvious things.
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron at huawei.com>
> ---
> drivers/resctrl/mpam_resctrl.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> include/linux/arm_mpam.h | 9 +++++++++
> 2 files changed, 36 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/resctrl/mpam_resctrl.c b/drivers/resctrl/mpam_resctrl.c
> index 84f517cb047a..059148c38a38 100644
> --- a/drivers/resctrl/mpam_resctrl.c
> +++ b/drivers/resctrl/mpam_resctrl.c
> @@ -93,6 +93,23 @@ bool resctrl_arch_mon_capable(void)
> return exposed_mon_capable;
> }
>
> +bool resctrl_arch_is_evt_configurable(enum resctrl_event_id evt)
> +{
> + return false;
> +}
> +
> +void resctrl_arch_mon_event_config_read(void *info)
> +{
> +}
> +
> +void resctrl_arch_mon_event_config_write(void *info)
> +{
> +}
> +
> +void resctrl_arch_reset_rmid_all(struct rdt_resource *r, struct rdt_mon_domain *d)
> +{
> +}
> +
> bool resctrl_arch_get_cdp_enabled(enum resctrl_res_level rid)
> {
> switch (rid) {
> @@ -1131,6 +1148,16 @@ int resctrl_arch_mbm_cntr_assign_set(struct rdt_resource *r, bool enable)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +int resctrl_arch_io_alloc_enable(struct rdt_resource *r, bool enable)
> +{
> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +}
> +
> +bool resctrl_arch_get_io_alloc_enabled(struct rdt_resource *r)
> +{
> + return false;
> +}
> +
> static int mpam_resctrl_control_init(struct mpam_resctrl_res *res,
> enum resctrl_res_level type)
> {
> diff --git a/include/linux/arm_mpam.h b/include/linux/arm_mpam.h
> index 86d5e326d2bd..f92a36187a52 100644
> --- a/include/linux/arm_mpam.h
> +++ b/include/linux/arm_mpam.h
> @@ -67,6 +67,15 @@ struct rdt_resource;
> void *resctrl_arch_mon_ctx_alloc(struct rdt_resource *r, enum resctrl_event_id evtid);
> void resctrl_arch_mon_ctx_free(struct rdt_resource *r, enum resctrl_event_id evtid, void *ctx);
>
> +/*
> + * The CPU configuration for MPAM is cheap to write, and is only written if it
> + * has changed. No need for fine grained enables.
> + */
> +static inline void resctrl_arch_enable_mon(void) { }
> +static inline void resctrl_arch_disable_mon(void) { }
> +static inline void resctrl_arch_enable_alloc(void) { }
> +static inline void resctrl_arch_disable_alloc(void) { }
> +
> static inline unsigned int resctrl_arch_round_mon_val(unsigned int val)
> {
> return val;
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list