[PATCH v2 13/20] drm/tilcdc: Remove the useless module list support

[Kory Maincent]

On Wed, 17 Dec 2025 15:25:40 +0100
"Luca Ceresoli" <luca.ceresoli at bootlin.com> wrote:

> On Thu Dec 11, 2025 at 5:38 PM CET, Kory Maincent (TI.com) wrote:
> > The tilcdc driver previously supported a sub-module system where
> > external display drivers (panels, encoders) could register themselves
> > through tilcdc_module_init() and be automatically initialized through
> > a module list. This infrastructure became unused after the component
> > framework support and panel driver was removed.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Kory Maincent (TI.com) <kory.maincent at bootlin.com>  
> 
> [...]
> 
> > @@ -562,24 +533,7 @@ static struct platform_driver tilcdc_platform_driver =
> > { .of_match_table = tilcdc_of_match,
> >  	},
> >  };
> > -
> > -static int __init tilcdc_drm_init(void)
> > -{
> > -	if (drm_firmware_drivers_only())
> > -		return -ENODEV;
> > -
> > -	DBG("init");
> > -	return platform_driver_register(&tilcdc_platform_driver);
> > -}
> > -
> > -static void __exit tilcdc_drm_fini(void)
> > -{
> > -	DBG("fini");
> > -	platform_driver_unregister(&tilcdc_platform_driver);
> > -}
> > -
> > -module_init(tilcdc_drm_init);
> > -module_exit(tilcdc_drm_fini);
> > +module_platform_driver(tilcdc_platform_driver);  
> 
> Is this hunk related to the removal of the module list? Looks like it
> should be a separate patch.

Indeed it is not directly related, but a following cleanup. I will put it in
another patch.

> 
> With that hunk removed (or kept if I'm wrong and it should stay):
> Reviewed-by: Luca Ceresoli <luca.ceresoli at bootlin.com>
-- 
Köry Maincent, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com