[PATCH v2 2/3] dt-bindings: pinctrl: samsung: Add exynos9610-wakeup-eint node

Alexandru Chimac alex at chimac.ro
Fri Jan 2 02:50:55 PST 2026






On Friday, January 2nd, 2026 at 12:02, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk at kernel.org> wrote:

> 
> 
> On 31/12/2025 13:28, Alexandru Chimac wrote:
> 
> > On Tuesday, December 30th, 2025 at 11:51, Krzysztof Kozlowski krzk at kernel.org wrote:
> > 
> > > On Sun, Dec 28, 2025 at 06:05:52PM +0000, Alexandru Chimac wrote:
> > > 
> > > > Add a dedicated compatible for the exynos9610-wakeup-eint node,
> > > > which is compatbile with Exynos850's implementation (and the
> > > > Exynos7 fallback).
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Alexandru Chimac alex at chimac.ro
> > > > ---
> > > > .../devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/samsung,pinctrl-wakeup-interrupt.yaml | 2 ++
> > > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> > > > 
> > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/samsung,pinctrl-wakeup-interrupt.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/samsung,pinctrl-wakeup-interrupt.yaml
> > > > index f3c433015b12..deb2730855bd 100644
> > > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/samsung,pinctrl-wakeup-interrupt.yaml
> > > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/samsung,pinctrl-wakeup-interrupt.yaml
> > > > @@ -48,6 +48,7 @@ properties:
> > > > - enum:
> > > > - google,gs101-wakeup-eint
> > > > - samsung,exynos2200-wakeup-eint
> > > > + - samsung,exynos9610-wakeup-eint
> > > > - samsung,exynos9810-wakeup-eint
> > > > - samsung,exynos990-wakeup-eint
> > > > - samsung,exynosautov9-wakeup-eint
> > > > @@ -107,6 +108,7 @@ allOf:
> > > > contains:
> > > > enum:
> > > > - samsung,exynos850-wakeup-eint
> > > > + - samsung,exynos9610-wakeup-eint
> > > 
> > > This is not needed. Device has 850 fallback, no?
> > > It's not required, but I guess it would make the device tree look better. If this patch isn't to be merged, it doesn't functionally affect anything so it can just be dropped instead of requiring another patchset revision.
> 
> 
> Please wrap your replies.
> 
> I did not comment on the patch. Comments are in specific places
> discussing specific lines. I asked why do you need this enum to grow?
Oh, sorry, I thought you meant the whole commit. Yeah, it looks wrong.
Thanks for noticing, I will fix it in v3.
> 
> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
Best regards,
Alexandru Chimac 



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list