Re: [fs-test] ❌ FAIL: Test report for for-kernelci (7.2.0-rc7, upstream-arm-next, 21d6ac05)
Eric Sandeen
sandeen at redhat.com
Tue Aug 25 11:47:38 PDT 2026
On 8/25/26 11:47 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 25, 2026 at 11:05:40AM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>> I've been trying to make sense of some of the automated testing like
>> this which seems to have been on autopilot for a while.
>>
>> Is this testing/reporting something that is still useful to you?
>>
>> I've been seeing the same btrfs test fail forever, I doubt it's arm-specific,
>> and I'm not sure anyone is looking into it.
>>
>> Would you like this testing to continue or is just noise now?
>
> Generally, the CKI testing is really useful and we use it all the time.
> I just ignore that btrfs test!
Fair enough! I just wanted to make sure someone was looking at this stuff.
Maybe we can exclude the btrfs test if it's always failing and nobody's going
to investigate and fix it, no reason to keep sending failure notices.
(and sorry, I see there was already another thread on this same run,
didn't mean to double up.)
-Eric
> Will
>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list