[PATCH 2/4] arm64: dts: rockchip: rk3399-pinephone-pro: DW9714 coil requires higher voltage

[Ondřej Jirman]

On Thu, Aug 06, 2026 at 01:49:07PM +0200, David Heidelberg wrote:
> On 06/08/2026 13:19, Ondřej Jirman wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > On Tue, Aug 04, 2026 at 11:12:21AM +0200, David Heidelberg wrote:
> > > On 04/08/2026 09:39, Ondřej Jirman wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > > 
> > > > On Sat, Aug 01, 2026 at 02:35:21AM +0200, David Heidelberg via B4 Relay wrote:
> > > > > From: David Heidelberg <david at ixit.cz>
> > > > > 
> > > > > By datasheet the VDD (in-kernel named vcc) range is between 2.3 to 4.3 V.
> > > > > Usually it's around 2.8 V. Here it matches the avdd2v8_dvp.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Fixes: 9336eb829a18 ("arm64: dts: rockchip: describe I2c Bus 1 and IMX258 world camera on PinePhone Pro")
> > > > > Cc: stable at vger.kernel.org
> > > > > Signed-off-by: David Heidelberg <david at ixit.cz>
> > > > > ---
> > > > >    arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-pinephone-pro.dts | 2 +-
> > > > >    1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > > > 
> > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-pinephone-pro.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-pinephone-pro.dts
> > > > > index d46cdfe3f7849..bde35d9b2263e 100644
> > > > > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-pinephone-pro.dts
> > > > > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-pinephone-pro.dts
> > > > > @@ -473,17 +473,17 @@ wcam_out: endpoint {
> > > > >    			};
> > > > >    		};
> > > > >    	};
> > > > >    	wcam_lens: camera-lens at c {
> > > > >    		compatible = "dongwoon,dw9714";
> > > > >    		reg = <0x0c>;
> > > > >    		/* Same I2c bus as both cameras, depends on vcca1v8_codec for power. */
> > > > > -		vcc-supply = <&vcc1v8_dvp>;
> > > > > +		vcc-supply = <&avdd2v8_dvp>;
> > > > 
> > > > This does not match reality, schematic says it's VCC2V8_DVP:
> > > > 
> > > > 	https://xff.cz/dl/tmp/6253a0465329df41.png
> > > 
> > > Ahoj,
> > > 
> > > thanks for spotting this, since I know you have the device, would be too
> > > much to ask you to send standalone fix for PP Pro?
> > > 
> > > I would drop the change from the series.
> > 
> > Ok. Just for the reference, vcc1v8_dvp here feeds an enable pin for VCC2V8_DVP
> > LDO regulator (which is supplied from VCC3V3_SYS and not described in DT, yet).
> > So in practice enabling vcc1v8_dvp enables both VCC2V8_DVP and AVDD2V8_DVP and
> > while DT does not describe the HW in detail, it describes the only regulator
> > that is actually controllable and enables all needed power rails for the camera
> > modules all by itself in proper order/timing.
> > 
> > Not sure what's the DT maintainers idea here about whether DT has to describe
> > every detail of power rails routing, or just what's pragmatic.
> 
> My perception is that DT syntax should describe everything, except passive
> components.
> 
> No additional GPIO is needed to enable VCC and AVDD?

Yes, it's completely transparent. vcc1v8_dvp indirectly powers up all other
camera sensor regulators.

Regards,
	o.j.

> Here, it seems to me that explanation like this in DT could cover it. But
> I'm no authority here :)
> 
> David
> 
> > 
> > Best regards,
> > 	o.j.
> > 
> > > David
> > > 
> > > P.S. I noticed I didn't mark this series RFC. Too late.
> > > 
> > > > 
> > > > regards,
> > > > 	o.
> > > > 
> > > > >    	};
> > > > >    	ucam: camera at 36 {
> > > > >    		compatible = "ovti,ov8858";
> > > > >    		reg = <0x36>;
> > > > >    		clocks = <&cru SCLK_CIF_OUT>; /* MIPI_MCLK1, derived from CIF_CLK0 */
> > > > >    		clock-names = "xvclk";
> > > > >    		dovdd-supply = <&vcc1v8_dvp>;
> > > > > 
> > > > > -- 
> > > > > 2.53.0
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > 
> > > -- 
> > > David Heidelberg
> > > 
> 
> -- 
> David Heidelberg
>