[PATCH net-next] net: stmmac: add tc-ets qdisc offload
Lorenzo Bianconi
lorenzo.bianconi at oss.qualcomm.com
Wed Aug 5 13:40:12 PDT 2026
> On Tue, Aug 04, 2026 at 08:17:35PM +0200, Lorenzo Bianconi wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > When all bands are strict priority, the MTL scheduler is programmed with
> > SP scheduling;
>
> ... and I replied too early _ sorry for the noise _ there is another small thing
thx for the review :)
> w.r.t. SP scheduling:
>
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_tc.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_tc.c
> > @@ -1210,6 +1210,73 @@ static int tc_setup_etf(struct stmmac_priv *priv,
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > +static int tc_setup_sp_sched(struct stmmac_priv *priv)
> > +{
> > + struct plat_stmmacenet_data *pdata = priv->plat;
> > + int i;
> > +
> > + for (i = 0; i < pdata->tx_queues_to_use; i++)
> > + pdata->tx_queues_cfg[i].weight = 0;
> > + stmmac_set_tx_queue_weight(priv);
> > +
> > + pdata->tx_sched_algorithm = MTL_TX_ALGORITHM_SP;
> > + stmmac_prog_mtl_tx_algorithms(priv, priv->hw,
> > + pdata->tx_sched_algorithm);
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
>
> The above function configures the stmmac SP queues to a well-known state where all
> queues are SP. However,
>
> [...]
>
> > +
> > +static int tc_setup_ets_sched(struct stmmac_priv *priv,
> > + struct tc_ets_qopt_offload *qopt)
> > +{
> > + struct tc_ets_qopt_offload_replace_params *p = &qopt->replace_params;
> > + struct plat_stmmacenet_data *pdata = priv->plat;
> > + int i, nstrict = 0;
> > +
> > + if (p->bands > priv->plat->tx_queues_to_use)
> > + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > +
> > + for (i = 0; i < p->bands; i++) {
> > + if (!p->quanta[i])
> > + nstrict++;
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (p->bands && nstrict)
> > + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > +
> > + if (nstrict) {
> > + tc_setup_sp_sched(priv);
>
> This is not necessarily what the user wants when setting up the ETS qdisc.
> The driver should parse 'priomap' (like in [1] or [2]) so that only 'nstrict'
> queues are involved, and selected based on the packet priority. Otherwise, the
> offloaded ETS is going to behave very differently from its full-software
> implementation _ which is something we probably want to avoid.
>
> [1] https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v7.1.5/source/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_ets.c#L36
> [2] https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v7.1.5/source/drivers/net/ethernet/airoha/airoha_eth.c#L2281
>
> WDYT? Any feedback appreciated!
ack, I agree. Since the hw assigns increasing priority to the sp queues (prio_n+1 > prio_n),
we should check the priomap according to the following code:
if (nstrict) {
if (nstrict != p->bands)
return -EINVAL;
for (i = 0; i < p->bands; i++) {
if (p->priomap[p->bands - i - 1] != i)
return -EINVAL;
}
...
}
Agree?
Regard,
Lorenzo
>
> --
> davide
>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 228 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20260805/969e228f/attachment.sig>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list