[PATCH v6 2/3] ARM: omap1: use platform_device_register_full() for GPIO devices on OMAP 16xx
Andy Shevchenko
andriy.shevchenko at linux.intel.com
Mon Apr 27 07:47:03 PDT 2026
On Mon, Apr 27, 2026 at 05:44:05PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 27, 2026 at 12:46:33PM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
...
> > for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(omap16xx_gpio_dev); i++) {
> > - pdev = omap16xx_gpio_dev[i];
> > + pdevinfo = omap16xx_gpio_dev[i];
> >
> > - res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
> > + res = &pdevinfo->res[0];
> > if (unlikely(!res)) {
> > dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Invalid mem resource.\n");
> > return -ENODEV;
>
> > base = ioremap(res->start, resource_size(res));
> > if (unlikely(!base)) {
> > - dev_err(&pdev->dev, "ioremap failed.\n");
> > + pr_err("ioremap failed.\n");
> > return -ENOMEM;
> > }
>
> Isn't this a stray change? Or why then? And why the previous dev_err() is left untouched?
If you go with pr_*(), please use ->name and ->id from pdevinfo to make it on par with the
previously called dev_err(). Perhaps even pr_fmt() on top of that (on top of the file).
> > __raw_writel(SYSCONFIG_WORD, base + OMAP1610_GPIO_SYSCONFIG);
> > iounmap(base);
> >
> > - platform_device_register(omap16xx_gpio_dev[i]);
> > + platform_device_register_full(omap16xx_gpio_dev[i]);
> > }
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list