[PATCH] dt-bindings: arm-smmu: qcom:: Fix Hawi compatible placement

Krzysztof Kozlowski krzysztof.kozlowski at oss.qualcomm.com
Wed Apr 22 02:04:09 PDT 2026


On 22/04/2026 10:33, Mukesh Ojha wrote:
> qcom,hawi-smmu-500 was placed in the wrong enum block of GPU. Move it to
> the correct location alongside other Qualcomm SMMU-500 compatibles for
> CPU.

How could it pass dtbs_check?

> 
> Fixes: 5e8323c3d528 ("dt-bindings: arm-smmu: qcom: Add compatible for Hawi SoC")
> Signed-off-by: Mukesh Ojha <mukesh.ojha at oss.qualcomm.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/arm,smmu.yaml | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/arm,smmu.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/arm,smmu.yaml
> index 06fb5c8e7547..ba9ad1f5a8ff 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/arm,smmu.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/arm,smmu.yaml
> @@ -37,6 +37,7 @@ properties:
>            - enum:
>                - qcom,eliza-smmu-500
>                - qcom,glymur-smmu-500
> +              - qcom,hawi-smmu-500
>                - qcom,kaanapali-smmu-500
>                - qcom,milos-smmu-500
>                - qcom,qcm2290-smmu-500
> @@ -93,7 +94,6 @@ properties:
>          items:
>            - enum:
>                - qcom,glymur-smmu-500
> -              - qcom,hawi-smmu-500

No, why? That's for GPU. Why are you moving GPU compatible to non-GPU place?



Best regards,
Krzysztof



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list