[PATCH RFC] arm64/scs: Fix potential sign extension issue of advance_loc4

[Wentao Guan]

The expression (*opcode++ << 24) and exp * code_alignment_factor
may overflow signed int and becomes negative.

Fix this by casting each byte to u64 before shifting. Also fix
the misaligned break statement while we are here.

Example of the result can be seen here:
Link: https://godbolt.org/z/zhY8d3595

It maybe not a real problem, but could be a issue in future.

Fixes: d499e9627d70 ("arm64/scs: Fix handling of advance_loc4")
Signed-off-by: Wentao Guan <guanwentao at uniontech.com>
---
 arch/arm64/kernel/pi/patch-scs.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/pi/patch-scs.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/pi/patch-scs.c
index dac568e4a54f2..3944ad899021c 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/pi/patch-scs.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/pi/patch-scs.c
@@ -196,9 +196,9 @@ static int scs_handle_fde_frame(const struct eh_frame *frame,
 			loc += *opcode++ * code_alignment_factor;
 			loc += (*opcode++ << 8) * code_alignment_factor;
 			loc += (*opcode++ << 16) * code_alignment_factor;
-			loc += (*opcode++ << 24) * code_alignment_factor;
+			loc += ((u64)*opcode++ << 24) * code_alignment_factor;
 			size -= 4;
-		break;
+			break;
 
 		case DW_CFA_def_cfa:
 		case DW_CFA_offset_extended:
-- 
2.30.2