[GIT PULL] firmware: arm_ffa: Fix for v7.1

[Sudeep Holla]

On Mon, Apr 13, 2026 at 08:23:58AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 11, 2026, at 19:35, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> > On Sat, Apr 11, 2026 at 10:49:50AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> >> On Tue, Apr 07, 2026 at 11:08:39AM +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> >> > ----------------------------------------------------------------
> >> > Arm FF-A fix for v7.1
> >> > 
> >> > Use the page aligned backing allocation size when computing the RXTX_MAP
> >> > page count. This fixes FF-A RX/TX buffer registration on kernels built
> >> > with 16K/64K PAGE_SIZE, where alloc_pages_exact() backs the buffer with a
> >> > larger aligned span than the discovered minimum buffer size.
> >> 
> >> Can we avoid per-driver trees or pulls? You do maintain also ARM SCMI
> >> firmware driver, so this could be sent together? I think you also use
> >> the same Git tree, right?
> >
> > Sure, I can put all of the firmware drivers I maintain together. I had
> > for some reason assumed individual PR is preferred.
> 
> To me, that's a function of how complex the changes are and how
> you describe them in the changelog text: If you have a lot of changes
> for the merge window, having one branch per firmware type probably
> works best, or even multiple ones if you have a series that implements
> something new and a number of random changes do existing code.
> 
> If you have only a handful of bugfixes across multiple firmware
> subsystems, a single 'firmware fixes' is less work for all of
> us, with no loss of readability in the git history.
> 

Understood, will try to follow something along these in the future.

-- 
Regards,
Sudeep