[PATCH 3/4] perf arm_spe: Decode Arm N1 IMPDEF events
Ian Rogers
irogers at google.com
Thu Apr 2 08:26:59 PDT 2026
On Wed, Apr 1, 2026 at 7:26 AM James Clark <james.clark at linaro.org> wrote:
>
> From the TRM [1], N1 has one IMPDEF event which isn't covered by the
> common list. Add a framework so that more cores can be added in the
> future and that the N1 IMPDEF event can be decoded. Also increase the
> size of the buffer because we're adding more strings and if it gets
> truncated it falls back to a hex dump only.
>
> [1]: https://developer.arm.com/documentation/100616/0401/Statistical-Profiling-Extension/implementation-defined-features-of-SPE
> Suggested-by: Al Grant <al.grant at arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: James Clark <james.clark at linaro.org>
> ---
> tools/perf/util/arm-spe-decoder/Build | 2 +
> .../util/arm-spe-decoder/arm-spe-pkt-decoder.c | 45 ++++++++++++++++++++--
> .../util/arm-spe-decoder/arm-spe-pkt-decoder.h | 5 ++-
> tools/perf/util/arm-spe.c | 13 ++++---
> 4 files changed, 54 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/arm-spe-decoder/Build b/tools/perf/util/arm-spe-decoder/Build
> index ab500e0efe24..97a298d1e279 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/arm-spe-decoder/Build
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/arm-spe-decoder/Build
> @@ -1 +1,3 @@
> perf-util-y += arm-spe-pkt-decoder.o arm-spe-decoder.o
> +
> +CFLAGS_arm-spe-pkt-decoder.o += -I$(srctree)/tools/arch/arm64/include/ -I$(OUTPUT)arch/arm64/include/generated/
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/arm-spe-decoder/arm-spe-pkt-decoder.c b/tools/perf/util/arm-spe-decoder/arm-spe-pkt-decoder.c
> index c880b0dec3a1..42a7501d4dfe 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/arm-spe-decoder/arm-spe-pkt-decoder.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/arm-spe-decoder/arm-spe-pkt-decoder.c
> @@ -15,6 +15,8 @@
>
> #include "arm-spe-pkt-decoder.h"
>
> +#include "../../arm64/include/asm/cputype.h"
Sashiko spotted:
https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260401-james-spe-impdef-decode-v1-0-ad0d372c220c%40linaro.org
"""
This isn't a bug, but does this include directive rely on accidental
path normalization?
The relative path ../../arm64/include/asm/cputype.h does not exist relative
to arm-spe-pkt-decoder.c. It only compiles because the Build file adds
-I$(srctree)/tools/arch/arm64/include/ to CFLAGS.
Would it be cleaner to use #include <asm/cputype.h> to explicitly rely on
the include path?
[ ... ]
"""
I wouldn't use <asm/cputype.h> due to cross-compilation and the like,
instead just add the extra "../" into the include path.
> +
> static const char * const arm_spe_packet_name[] = {
> [ARM_SPE_PAD] = "PAD",
> [ARM_SPE_END] = "END",
> @@ -307,6 +309,11 @@ static const struct ev_string common_ev_strings[] = {
> { .event = 0, .desc = NULL },
> };
>
> +static const struct ev_string n1_event_strings[] = {
> + { .event = 12, .desc = "LATE-PREFETCH" },
> + { .event = 0, .desc = NULL },
> +};
> +
> static u64 print_event_list(int *err, char **buf, size_t *buf_len,
> const struct ev_string *ev_strings, u64 payload)
> {
> @@ -318,14 +325,44 @@ static u64 print_event_list(int *err, char **buf, size_t *buf_len,
> return payload;
> }
>
> +struct event_print_handle {
> + const struct midr_range *midr_ranges;
> + const struct ev_string *ev_strings;
> +};
> +
> +#define EV_PRINT(range, strings) \
> + { \
> + .midr_ranges = range, \
> + .ev_strings = strings, \
> + }
> +
> +static const struct midr_range n1_event_encoding_cpus[] = {
> + MIDR_ALL_VERSIONS(MIDR_NEOVERSE_N1),
> + {},
> +};
> +
> +static const struct event_print_handle event_print_handles[] = {
> + EV_PRINT(n1_event_encoding_cpus, n1_event_strings),
> +};
> +
> static int arm_spe_pkt_desc_event(const struct arm_spe_pkt *packet,
> - char *buf, size_t buf_len)
> + char *buf, size_t buf_len, u64 midr)
> {
> u64 payload = packet->payload;
> int err = 0;
>
> arm_spe_pkt_out_string(&err, &buf, &buf_len, "EV");
> - print_event_list(&err, &buf, &buf_len, common_ev_strings, payload);
> + payload = print_event_list(&err, &buf, &buf_len, common_ev_strings,
> + payload);
> +
> + /* Try to decode IMPDEF bits for known CPUs */
> + for (unsigned int i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(event_print_handles); i++) {
> + if (is_midr_in_range_list(midr,
> + event_print_handles[i].midr_ranges))
> + payload = print_event_list(&err, &buf, &buf_len,
> + event_print_handles[i].ev_strings,
> + payload);
> + }
>
> return err;
> }
> @@ -506,7 +543,7 @@ static int arm_spe_pkt_desc_counter(const struct arm_spe_pkt *packet,
> }
>
> int arm_spe_pkt_desc(const struct arm_spe_pkt *packet, char *buf,
> - size_t buf_len)
> + size_t buf_len, u64 midr)
> {
> int idx = packet->index;
> unsigned long long payload = packet->payload;
> @@ -522,7 +559,7 @@ int arm_spe_pkt_desc(const struct arm_spe_pkt *packet, char *buf,
> arm_spe_pkt_out_string(&err, &buf, &blen, "%s", name);
> break;
> case ARM_SPE_EVENTS:
> - err = arm_spe_pkt_desc_event(packet, buf, buf_len);
> + err = arm_spe_pkt_desc_event(packet, buf, buf_len, midr);
> break;
> case ARM_SPE_OP_TYPE:
> err = arm_spe_pkt_desc_op_type(packet, buf, buf_len);
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/arm-spe-decoder/arm-spe-pkt-decoder.h b/tools/perf/util/arm-spe-decoder/arm-spe-pkt-decoder.h
> index adf4cde320aa..17b067fe3c87 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/arm-spe-decoder/arm-spe-pkt-decoder.h
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/arm-spe-decoder/arm-spe-pkt-decoder.h
> @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@
> #include <stddef.h>
> #include <stdint.h>
>
> -#define ARM_SPE_PKT_DESC_MAX 256
> +#define ARM_SPE_PKT_DESC_MAX 512
>
> #define ARM_SPE_NEED_MORE_BYTES -1
> #define ARM_SPE_BAD_PACKET -2
> @@ -186,5 +186,6 @@ const char *arm_spe_pkt_name(enum arm_spe_pkt_type);
> int arm_spe_get_packet(const unsigned char *buf, size_t len,
> struct arm_spe_pkt *packet);
>
> -int arm_spe_pkt_desc(const struct arm_spe_pkt *packet, char *buf, size_t len);
> +int arm_spe_pkt_desc(const struct arm_spe_pkt *packet, char *buf, size_t len,
> + u64 midr);
> #endif
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/arm-spe.c b/tools/perf/util/arm-spe.c
> index 7447b000f9cd..46f0309c092b 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/arm-spe.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/arm-spe.c
> @@ -135,7 +135,7 @@ struct data_source_handle {
> }
>
> static void arm_spe_dump(struct arm_spe *spe __maybe_unused,
> - unsigned char *buf, size_t len)
> + unsigned char *buf, size_t len, u64 midr)
> {
> struct arm_spe_pkt packet;
> size_t pos = 0;
> @@ -161,7 +161,7 @@ static void arm_spe_dump(struct arm_spe *spe __maybe_unused,
> color_fprintf(stdout, color, " ");
> if (ret > 0) {
> ret = arm_spe_pkt_desc(&packet, desc,
> - ARM_SPE_PKT_DESC_MAX);
> + ARM_SPE_PKT_DESC_MAX, midr);
> if (!ret)
> color_fprintf(stdout, color, " %s\n", desc);
> } else {
> @@ -174,10 +174,10 @@ static void arm_spe_dump(struct arm_spe *spe __maybe_unused,
> }
>
> static void arm_spe_dump_event(struct arm_spe *spe, unsigned char *buf,
> - size_t len)
> + size_t len, u64 midr)
> {
> printf(".\n");
> - arm_spe_dump(spe, buf, len);
> + arm_spe_dump(spe, buf, len, midr);
> }
>
> static int arm_spe_get_trace(struct arm_spe_buffer *b, void *data)
> @@ -1469,8 +1469,11 @@ static int arm_spe_process_auxtrace_event(struct perf_session *session,
> /* Dump here now we have copied a piped trace out of the pipe */
> if (dump_trace) {
> if (auxtrace_buffer__get_data(buffer, fd)) {
> + u64 midr = 0;
> +
> + arm_spe__get_midr(spe, buffer->cpu.cpu, &midr);
Sashiko claims to have spotted an issue here:
"""
Is it possible for arm_spe__get_midr() to cause a segmentation fault here?
If the trace is from an older recording (metadata version 1) and the
environment lacks a CPUID string (such as during cross-architecture
analysis), perf_env__cpuid() returns NULL.
It appears arm_spe__get_midr() then passes this NULL pointer to
strtol(cpuid, NULL, 16), which leads to undefined behavior.
"""
But this feels like, if this happens you're already having a bad time
and these changes aren't necessarily making things worse.
Thanks,
Ian
> arm_spe_dump_event(spe, buffer->data,
> - buffer->size);
> + buffer->size, midr);
> auxtrace_buffer__put_data(buffer);
> }
> }
>
> --
> 2.34.1
>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list