[PATCH] KVM: arm64: Use pointer from memcpy() call for assignment in init_hyp_mode()
Mark Rutland
mark.rutland at arm.com
Thu Oct 30 10:49:51 PDT 2025
On Thu, Oct 30, 2025 at 06:11:03PM +0100, Markus Elfring wrote:
> From: Markus Elfring <elfring at users.sourceforge.net>
> Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2025 18:01:41 +0100
>
> A pointer was assigned to a variable. The same pointer was used for
> the destination parameter of a memcpy() call.
> This function is documented in the way that the same value is returned.
> Thus convert two separate statements into a direct variable assignment for
> the return value from a memory copy action.
>
> The source code was transformed by using the Coccinelle software.
>
> Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring at users.sourceforge.net>
> ---
> arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
> index 870953b4a8a7..feab88c31703 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
> @@ -2600,8 +2600,8 @@ static int __init init_hyp_mode(void)
> goto out_err;
> }
>
> - page_addr = page_address(page);
> - memcpy(page_addr, CHOOSE_NVHE_SYM(__per_cpu_start), nvhe_percpu_size());
> + page_addr = memcpy(page_address(page), CHOOSE_NVHE_SYM(__per_cpu_start),
> + nvhe_percpu_size());
This change makes the code harder to read, and harder to modify. It
saves no space.
As Dan said [1]:
| No one will thank you for making these changes... :( Please don't do
| it.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/aQNsecHJSO2U68Fc@stanley.mountain/
Mark.
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list