[PATCH v2 4/5] rtc: tps6586x: Fix initial enable_irq/disable_irq balance

[Alexandre Belloni]

On 29/10/2025 09:20:17+0000, Jon Hunter wrote:
> Hi Esben,
> 
> On 16/05/2025 08:23, Esben Haabendal wrote:
> > Interrupts are automatically enabled when requested, so we need to
> > initialize irq_en accordingly to avoid causing an unbalanced enable
> > warning.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Esben Haabendal <esben at geanix.com>
> > ---
> >   drivers/rtc/rtc-tps6586x.c | 1 +
> >   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-tps6586x.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-tps6586x.c
> > index 54c8429b16bfcc692b1f4d5404f0c42f720e93b4..76ecf7b798f0de22aa89a552a263b473ab3065ef 100644
> > --- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-tps6586x.c
> > +++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-tps6586x.c
> > @@ -258,6 +258,7 @@ static int tps6586x_rtc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >   	irq_set_status_flags(rtc->irq, IRQ_NOAUTOEN);
> > +	rtc->irq_en = true;
> >   	ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(&pdev->dev, rtc->irq, NULL,
> >   				tps6586x_rtc_irq,
> >   				IRQF_ONESHOT,
> > 
> 
> I have bisected a suspend regression on one of our Tegra20 boards (that uses
> this driver) and bisect is pointing to this commit. Reverting this commit
> fixes the problem.
> 
> Looking at the above I see that the flag IRQ_NOAUTOEN is being set and so
> now with your change we never enable the interrupt. Hence, the wake-ups are
> now broken and suspend testing fails. So it would seem best to revert this.
> 
> BTW, I looked at the change to the CPCAP driver and that driver actively
> disables the IRQ after requesting it and so I am wondering if that will also
> have alarm issues? I don't have a board with CPCAP to test.
> 

That's right, I guess you can send reverts.


-- 
Alexandre Belloni, co-owner and COO, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com