[PATCH v2 RESEND 1/2] ARM: spectre-v2: Fix potential missing mitigations

Sebastian Andrzej Siewior bigeasy at linutronix.de
Tue Oct 28 11:20:52 PDT 2025


On 2025-10-28 17:20:06 [+0100], To Xie Yuanbin wrote:
> On 2025-10-16 20:16:21 [+0800], Xie Yuanbin wrote:
> > Over the past six years, there have been continuous reports of this bug:
>> > 2019.3.19 https://lore.kernel.org/all/20190319203239.gl46fxnfz6gzeeic@linutronix.de/
> > 
> > To fix it, we must check whether mitigation are needed before enabling
> > interrupt(with PREEMPT) or before calling mm_read_lock()(without PREEMPT).
> > 
> > Fixes: f5fe12b1eaee ("ARM: spectre-v2: harden user aborts in kernel space")
> 
> Hmm.
> I was moving things back in 2019 but things shifted and this is no
> longer required. If I apply both patches (of yours) then it sends a
> signal with disabled interrupts which breaks my PREEMPT_RT case.

Now I got my things together.
LPAE enables interrupts early in do_page_fault(), therefore accessing a
kernel address from userland triggers the warning in
harden_branch_predictor() before sending the signal.

!LPAE does do_bad_area() -> __do_user_fault() and does not trigger the
warning in harden_branch_predictor() because the interrupts are off. 
On PREEMPT_RT this leads to an error due to accessing spinlock_t from
force_sig_fault() with disabled interrupts. Therefore I did enable
interrupts early and would need end up with the same warning as in the
LPAE case.

Now Russell wants to keep interrupts/ preemption disabled for the
address > TASK_SIZE for the entire page fault path to so that
harden_branch_predictor() works properly.

If we need that, then it won't work with the preempt-disable suggestion
I had… We don't send SIGKILL because userland might want emulate paging
for the kernel regions. Okay.

I guess the requirement is to invoke harden_branch_predictor() on the
same CPU that triggered the page_fault, right? Couldn't we then move
harden_branch_predictor() a little bit earlier, invoke it in the >=
TASK_SIZE case and then enable interrupts if they were enabled?

That would make me happy ;)

Sebastian



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list