[PATCH 1/2] ARM/efi: Remove duplicate permission settings
Ard Biesheuvel
ardb at kernel.org
Tue Oct 28 06:42:57 PDT 2025
On Mon, 27 Oct 2025 at 04:46, Qiang Ma <maqianga at uniontech.com> wrote:
>
>
> 在 2025/10/23 16:30, Ard Biesheuvel 写道:
> > On Thu, 23 Oct 2025 at 10:22, Qiang Ma <maqianga at uniontech.com> wrote:
> >> In the efi_virtmap_init(), permission settings have been applied:
> >>
> >> static bool __init efi_virtmap_init(void)
> >> {
> >> ...
> >> for_each_efi_memory_desc(md)
> >> ...
> >> efi_create_mapping(&efi_mm, md);
> >> ...
> >> efi_memattr_apply_permissions(&efi_mm, efi_set_mapping_permissions);
> >> ...
> >> }
> >>
> >> Therefore, there is no need to apply it again in the efi_create_mapping().
> >>
> >> Fixes: 9fc68b717c24 ("ARM/efi: Apply strict permissions for UEFI Runtime Services regions")
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Qiang Ma <maqianga at uniontech.com>
> > No, efi_memattr_apply_permissions() uses the /optional/ memory
> > attributes table, whereas efi_create_mapping() uses the permission
> > attributes in the EFI memory map. The memory attributes table is
> > optional, in which case any RO/XP attributes from the memory map
> > should be used.
> >
> I see.
>
> Then, can it be modified like this?
No
> --- a/arch/arm/kernel/efi.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/efi.c
> @@ -65,16 +65,13 @@ int __init efi_create_mapping(struct mm_struct *mm,
> efi_memory_desc_t *md)
> desc.type = MT_MEMORY_RWX_NONCACHED;
> else if (md->attribute & EFI_MEMORY_WC)
> desc.type = MT_DEVICE_WC;
> + else if (md->attribute & (EFI_MEMORY_RO | EFI_MEMORY_XP))
This will be true for RO, XP or RO+XP.
> + desc.type = MT_MEMORY_RO;
This will apply RO permissions even to XP regions, which need to be writable.
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list