[PATCH RFC 0/9] gpio: improve support for shared GPIOs

[Mark Brown]

On Mon, Oct 20, 2025 at 11:41:52AM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 17, 2025 at 7:32 PM Mark Brown <broonie at kernel.org> wrote:

> > It really should be the actual physical state change that triggers the
> > event.

> I guess so, but this would require some non-trivial rework of the
> regulator core. We'd need some list of deferred notifications stored
> in memory for when the physical state actually changes.

I'm not sure I see the need for deferred notifications?  We'd need to go
round all the users whenever a physical change to the GPIO happens but
it's not clear what we'd need to store beyond the list of users?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20251021/4d7996f3/attachment.sig>