[PATCH v4 08/31] clk: at91: clk-master: use clk_parent_data

[Claudiu Beznea]

Hi, Ryan,

On 9/19/25 00:15, Ryan.Wanner at microchip.com wrote:
> From: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea at tuxon.dev>
> 
> Use struct clk_parent_data instead of struct parent_hw as this leads
> to less usage of __clk_get_hw() in SoC specific clock drivers and simpler
> conversion of existing SoC specific clock drivers from parent_names to
> modern clk_parent_data structures.
> 
> __clk_get_hw will be removed in subsequent patches.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea at tuxon.dev>
> [ryan.wanner at microchip.com: Add clk-master changes to SAM9X75 and
> SAMA7D65 SoCs. As well as add md_slck commit message.]
> Signed-off-by: Ryan Wanner <Ryan.Wanner at microchip.com>
> ---

[...]

> @@ -752,15 +752,17 @@ static void __init sam9x7_pmc_setup(struct device_node *np)
>  	struct regmap *regmap;
>  	struct clk_hw *hw, *main_rc_hw, *main_osc_hw, *main_xtal_hw;
>  	struct clk_hw *td_slck_hw, *md_slck_hw, *usbck_hw;
> -	struct clk_parent_data parent_data[2];
> +	struct clk_parent_data parent_data[9];
>  	struct clk_hw *parent_hws[9];
>  	int i, j;
>  
>  	td_slck_hw = __clk_get_hw(of_clk_get_by_name(np, "td_slck"));
>  	md_slck_hw = __clk_get_hw(of_clk_get_by_name(np, "md_slck"));
> -	i = of_property_match_string(np, "clock-names", "main_xtal");
> +	if (!td_slck_hw || !md_slck_hw)
> +		return;
>  
> -	if (!td_slck_hw || !md_slck_hw || !i)
> +	i = of_property_match_string(np, "clock-names", "main_xtal");
> +	if (i < 0)
>  		return;

The diff here should be gone from this patch if handled in previous
conversion patches.