[PATCH 0/4] dt-bindings: treewide: don't check node names

[Conor Dooley]

On Mon, Oct 20, 2025 at 08:09:49AM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> Node names are already and properly checked by the core schema. No need
> to do it again.
> 
> These are all occurrences I found in linux-next as of 20251015. I did
> run dt_bindings_check successfully. I haven't done a way to run
> dtbs_check yet because I would need to identify the proper architecture
> first, right? Is there some tool which tests all DTs of a certain
> binding? At least build bot is happy, I don't know if it checks DTs as
> well, though.
> 
> I'd suggest to give subsystems some time to pick these patches before
> Rob applies the remaining ones?
> 
> 
> Wolfram Sang (4):
>   dt-bindings: bus: don't check node names
>   dt-bindings: nvmem: don't check node names
>   ASoC: dt-bindings: don't check node names
>   dt-bindings: spi: don't check node names

Acked-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley at microchip.com>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 228 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20251020/d6c94db4/attachment.sig>