[PATCH v6 4/6] clk: samsung: add Exynos ACPM clock driver

[Tudor Ambarus]

On 10/20/25 10:58 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 20/10/2025 11:19, Tudor Ambarus wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 10/20/25 9:22 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> On 20/10/2025 09:45, Tudor Ambarus wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 10/20/25 7:54 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/clk/samsung/Kconfig b/drivers/clk/samsung/Kconfig
>>>>>> index 76a494e95027af26272e30876a87ac293bd56dfa..70a8b82a0136b4d0213d8ff95e029c52436e5c7f 100644
>>>>>> --- a/drivers/clk/samsung/Kconfig
>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/clk/samsung/Kconfig
>>>>>> @@ -95,6 +95,16 @@ config EXYNOS_CLKOUT
>>>>>>  	  status of the certains clocks from SoC, but it could also be tied to
>>>>>>  	  other devices as an input clock.
>>>>>>  
>>>>>> +config EXYNOS_ACPM_CLK
>>>>>> +	tristate "Clock driver controlled via ACPM interface"
>>>>>> +	depends on EXYNOS_ACPM_PROTOCOL || (COMPILE_TEST && !EXYNOS_ACPM_PROTOCOL)
>>>>>
>>>>> I merged the patches but I don't get why we are not enabling it by
>>>>> default, just like every other clock driver. What is so special here?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks! Are you referring to the depends on line? I needed it otherwise
>>>> on randconfigs where COMPILE_TEST=y and EXYNOS_ACPM_PROTOCOL=n I get:
>>>
>>>
>>> No. I am referring to missing default and defconfig patch.
>>>
>>
>> default m or y would force compilation of EXYNOS_ACPM_CLK and
>> EXYNOS_ACPM_PROTOCOL for all ARCH_EXYNOS, even on Exynos platforms that
>> don't use ACPM. Since ACPM is not universally required by the Exynos
>> architecture, I thought to make it opt-in (default n).
> 
> 
> Just like every clock driver. So again - how is it different?

The key difference lies in the universality of the hardware interface
across the ARCH_EXYNOS family. If EXYNOS_AUDSS_CLK_CON, EXYNOS_CLKOUT
are considered core, integral, or nearly universal features across
Exynos SoCs, then it's alright to have them by default. I can't tell how
common is ACPM across the Samsung Exynos SoCs. I know it's present on
gs{1,2)01 and e850. Heard it mentioned around some other phone but I
can't remember which. Maybe we shall set to a default m when more users
reveal themselves? I'm of course open to drop the defconfig patch and
follow up with a patch setting EXYNOS_ACPM_CLK to
"default m if ARCH_EXYNOS" if you think it's common enough.

Cheers,
ta