[PATCH v6 4/6] clk: samsung: add Exynos ACPM clock driver
Tudor Ambarus
tudor.ambarus at linaro.org
Mon Oct 20 02:19:59 PDT 2025
On 10/20/25 9:22 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 20/10/2025 09:45, Tudor Ambarus wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 10/20/25 7:54 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/clk/samsung/Kconfig b/drivers/clk/samsung/Kconfig
>>>> index 76a494e95027af26272e30876a87ac293bd56dfa..70a8b82a0136b4d0213d8ff95e029c52436e5c7f 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/clk/samsung/Kconfig
>>>> +++ b/drivers/clk/samsung/Kconfig
>>>> @@ -95,6 +95,16 @@ config EXYNOS_CLKOUT
>>>> status of the certains clocks from SoC, but it could also be tied to
>>>> other devices as an input clock.
>>>>
>>>> +config EXYNOS_ACPM_CLK
>>>> + tristate "Clock driver controlled via ACPM interface"
>>>> + depends on EXYNOS_ACPM_PROTOCOL || (COMPILE_TEST && !EXYNOS_ACPM_PROTOCOL)
>>>
>>> I merged the patches but I don't get why we are not enabling it by
>>> default, just like every other clock driver. What is so special here?
>>
>> Thanks! Are you referring to the depends on line? I needed it otherwise
>> on randconfigs where COMPILE_TEST=y and EXYNOS_ACPM_PROTOCOL=n I get:
>
>
> No. I am referring to missing default and defconfig patch.
>
default m or y would force compilation of EXYNOS_ACPM_CLK and
EXYNOS_ACPM_PROTOCOL for all ARCH_EXYNOS, even on Exynos platforms that
don't use ACPM. Since ACPM is not universally required by the Exynos
architecture, I thought to make it opt-in (default n).
Setting it as a module in arm64 defconfig makes it available on
compatible platforms.
Similar clock drivers do the same: CLK_RASPBERRYPI.
COMMON_CLK_SCPI, COMMON_CLK_SCMI - no defaults and set them as builtin
in the arm64 defconfig.
Cheers,
ta
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list