[PATCH v8 2/2] MAINTAINERS: Add entry for Innosilicon hdmi bridge library
Andy Yan
andyshrk at 163.com
Fri Oct 17 01:56:38 PDT 2025
Hello Maud,
At 2025-10-17 15:58:22, "Maud Spierings" <maud_spierings at murena.io> wrote:
>Hi Andy,
>
>> From: Andy Yan <andy.yan at rock-chips.com>
>>
>> Add entry for Innosilicon hdmi bridge library
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Andy Yan <andy.yan at rock-chips.com>
>> ---
>>
>> (no changes since v1)
>>
>> MAINTAINERS | 8 ++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
>> index f9f985c7d7479..0adcfb1c264a1 100644
>> --- a/MAINTAINERS
>> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
>> @@ -12299,6 +12299,14 @@ M: Samuel Holland <samuel at sholland.org>
>> S: Maintained
>> F: drivers/power/supply/ip5xxx_power.c
>>
>> +INNOSILICON HDMI BRIDGE DRIVER
>> +M: Andy Yan <andy.yan at rock-chips.com>
>> +L: dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org
>> +S: Maintained
>> +T: git https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/misc/kernel.git
>> +F: drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/inno-hdmi.c
>> +F: include/drm/bridge/inno_hdmi.h
>> +
>> INOTIFY
>> M: Jan Kara <jack at suse.cz>
>> R: Amir Goldstein <amir73il at gmail.com>
>> --
>> 2.43.0
>
>I believe this patch should be squashed into the patch that actually
>creates the files listed in the MAINTAINERS entry, like I do here [1].
>Checkpatch should be complaining about patch [1/2] if I'm not mistaken,
>when you run `b4 prep --check`.
We talked about something similar here[2]:
Maxime believes they should be separate patches,
And I've seen many merged commits in the kernel are also handle MAINTAINERS entry as separate patches
[2]https://lore.kernel.org/linux-rockchip/3ygqnj4idey7u4m7ltlv7pnfhkkvcepmpfdijdszctaeopq3ky@qteg33comjl3/
>
>Link:
>https://lore.kernel.org/all/20251009-max25014-v4-1-6adb2a0aa35f@gocontroll.com/
>[1]
>
>Kind regards,
>Maud
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list