[PATCH] arm64: defconfig: Change CONFIG_SM_TCSRCC_8750 from m to y

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 17/10/2025 07:49, Taniya Das wrote:
> 
> 
> On 10/17/2025 10:51 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 17/10/2025 07:16, Taniya Das wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 10/17/2025 10:00 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>> On 16/10/2025 20:53, Taniya Das wrote:
>>>>> The TCSR clock controller is required  during boot to provide the ref
>>>>> clocks to the UFS controller. Setting CONFIG_SM_TCSRCC_8750 to y ensures
>>>>> the UFS driver successfully probe and initialize the device.
>>>>>
>>>>> Without this change, the UFS subsystem fails to mount as a usable file
>>>>> system during boot.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> That's not what I observed. UFS works fine, especially that it is a
>>>> module, so no, this is not a desired change and explanation is not only
>>>> insufficient but actually incorrect.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Krzysztof, on Pakala MTP we are observing the below issue and it
>>> requires the module of tscrcc to be loaded explicitly. This patch also
>>> aligns to how it is on all other targets.
>>>
>>> /soc at 0/phy at 1d80000: Failed to get clk index: 2 ret: -517
>>> [   10.496570] ufshcd-qcom 1d84000.ufs: freq-table-hz property not specified
>>> [   10.503660] ufshcd-qcom 1d84000.ufs: ufshcd_populate_vreg: Unable to
>>> find vdd-hba-supply regulator, assuming enabled
>>> [   10.514548] ufshcd-qcom 1d84000.ufs: ufshcd_populate_vreg: Unable to
>>> find vccq2-supply regulator, assuming enabled
>>> [   10.565955] platform 1d80000.phy: deferred probe pending: (reason
>>> unknown)
>>> [   10.573078] platform 1d84000.ufs: deferred probe pending:
>>> ufshcd-qcom: ufshcd_pltfrm_init() failed
>>>
>>
>>
>> I don't and I am testing regularly, so I assume you have incorrect
>> config. Maybe I have incorrect one (which works), but then commit msg is
>> incomplete - you must explain the bug and provide proof that this is the
>> correct fix for it.
>>
> 
> We have tried booting up recently and and that is what we observed. The
> patch from 'm' to 'y' helps the UFS probe is successful and the rootfs
> is picked from ufs partitions. I will add these fail & success log
> snippets in the commit text.

That's not enough. You need to explain why UFS fails. After explaining
this, I guess bug in UFS would be exposed thus that one should be fixed.
You just provided band-aid without fixing the real problem.

NAK

> 
> [    0.000000] Machine model: Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. SM8750 MTP
> ....
> [    3.133373] ufshcd-qcom 1d84000.ufs: freq-table-hz property not specified
> [    3.144480] ufshcd-qcom 1d84000.ufs: ufshcd_populate_vreg: Unable to
> find vdd-hba-supply regulator, assuming enabled
> [    3.144585] ufshcd-qcom 1d84000.ufs: ufshcd_populate_vreg: Unable to
> find vccq2-supply regulator, assuming enabled
> [    3.227770] ufshcd-qcom 1d84000.ufs: Resource ufs_mem not provided
> [    3.238319] ufshcd-qcom 1d84000.ufs: MCQ mode is disabled, err=-19



Best regards,
Krzysztof