[PATCH] arm64: defconfig: Change CONFIG_SM_TCSRCC_8750 from m to y
Krzysztof Kozlowski
krzk at kernel.org
Thu Oct 16 22:21:30 PDT 2025
On 17/10/2025 07:16, Taniya Das wrote:
>
>
> On 10/17/2025 10:00 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 16/10/2025 20:53, Taniya Das wrote:
>>> The TCSR clock controller is required during boot to provide the ref
>>> clocks to the UFS controller. Setting CONFIG_SM_TCSRCC_8750 to y ensures
>>> the UFS driver successfully probe and initialize the device.
>>>
>>> Without this change, the UFS subsystem fails to mount as a usable file
>>> system during boot.
>>
>>
>> That's not what I observed. UFS works fine, especially that it is a
>> module, so no, this is not a desired change and explanation is not only
>> insufficient but actually incorrect.
>>
>
> Krzysztof, on Pakala MTP we are observing the below issue and it
> requires the module of tscrcc to be loaded explicitly. This patch also
> aligns to how it is on all other targets.
>
> /soc at 0/phy at 1d80000: Failed to get clk index: 2 ret: -517
> [ 10.496570] ufshcd-qcom 1d84000.ufs: freq-table-hz property not specified
> [ 10.503660] ufshcd-qcom 1d84000.ufs: ufshcd_populate_vreg: Unable to
> find vdd-hba-supply regulator, assuming enabled
> [ 10.514548] ufshcd-qcom 1d84000.ufs: ufshcd_populate_vreg: Unable to
> find vccq2-supply regulator, assuming enabled
> [ 10.565955] platform 1d80000.phy: deferred probe pending: (reason
> unknown)
> [ 10.573078] platform 1d84000.ufs: deferred probe pending:
> ufshcd-qcom: ufshcd_pltfrm_init() failed
>
I don't and I am testing regularly, so I assume you have incorrect
config. Maybe I have incorrect one (which works), but then commit msg is
incomplete - you must explain the bug and provide proof that this is the
correct fix for it.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list